From 9ddd673ff000280299c0ae654f33c519aa52789b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bart Van Assche Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 14:20:46 -0700 Subject: libfc: Fix fc_exch_recv_req() error path commit f6979adeaab578f8ca14fdd32b06ddee0d9d3314 upstream. Due to patch "libfc: Do not invoke the response handler after fc_exch_done()" (commit ID 7030fd62) the lport_recv() call in fc_exch_recv_req() is passed a dangling pointer. Avoid this by moving the fc_frame_free() call from fc_invoke_resp() to its callers. This patch fixes the following crash: general protection fault: 0000 [#3] PREEMPT SMP RIP: fc_lport_recv_req+0x72/0x280 [libfc] Call Trace: fc_exch_recv+0x642/0xde0 [libfc] fcoe_percpu_receive_thread+0x46a/0x5ed [fcoe] kthread+0x10a/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x42/0x70 Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev Signed-off-by: James Bottomley Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/scsi') diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c index 1b3a09473452..30f9ef0c0d4f 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c @@ -733,8 +733,6 @@ static bool fc_invoke_resp(struct fc_exch *ep, struct fc_seq *sp, if (resp) { resp(sp, fp, arg); res = true; - } else if (!IS_ERR(fp)) { - fc_frame_free(fp); } spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock); @@ -1596,7 +1594,8 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, struct fc_frame *fp) * If new exch resp handler is valid then call that * first. */ - fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp); + if (!fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp)) + fc_frame_free(fp); fc_exch_release(ep); return; @@ -1695,7 +1694,8 @@ static void fc_exch_abts_resp(struct fc_exch *ep, struct fc_frame *fp) fc_exch_hold(ep); if (!rc) fc_exch_delete(ep); - fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp); + if (!fc_invoke_resp(ep, sp, fp)) + fc_frame_free(fp); if (has_rec) fc_exch_timer_set(ep, ep->r_a_tov); fc_exch_release(ep); -- cgit v1.2.3