aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/jdk/nashorn/internal/codegen/TypeEvaluator.java
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/jdk/nashorn/internal/codegen/TypeEvaluator.java')
-rw-r--r--src/jdk/nashorn/internal/codegen/TypeEvaluator.java250
1 files changed, 250 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/jdk/nashorn/internal/codegen/TypeEvaluator.java b/src/jdk/nashorn/internal/codegen/TypeEvaluator.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d5282a8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/jdk/nashorn/internal/codegen/TypeEvaluator.java
@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2010, 2014, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
+ *
+ * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this
+ * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided
+ * by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code.
+ *
+ * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
+ * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
+ * accompanied this code).
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
+ * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
+ * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
+ *
+ * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
+ * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
+ * questions.
+ */
+
+package jdk.nashorn.internal.codegen;
+
+import static jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.Property.NOT_CONFIGURABLE;
+import static jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.Property.NOT_ENUMERABLE;
+import static jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.Property.NOT_WRITABLE;
+
+import java.lang.invoke.MethodType;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.codegen.types.Type;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.ir.AccessNode;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.ir.CallNode;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.ir.Expression;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.ir.FunctionNode;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.ir.IdentNode;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.ir.IndexNode;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.ir.Optimistic;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.objects.ArrayBufferView;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.objects.NativeArray;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.FindProperty;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.JSType;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.Property;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.RecompilableScriptFunctionData;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.ScriptFunction;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.ScriptObject;
+import jdk.nashorn.internal.runtime.ScriptRuntime;
+
+/**
+ * Functionality for using a runtime scope to look up value types.
+ * Used during recompilation.
+ */
+final class TypeEvaluator {
+ /**
+ * Type signature for invocation of functions without parameters: we must pass (callee, this) of type
+ * (ScriptFunction, Object) respectively. We also use Object as the return type (we must pass something,
+ * but it'll be ignored; it can't be void, though).
+ */
+ private static final MethodType EMPTY_INVOCATION_TYPE = MethodType.methodType(Object.class, ScriptFunction.class, Object.class);
+
+ private final Compiler compiler;
+ private final ScriptObject runtimeScope;
+
+ TypeEvaluator(final Compiler compiler, final ScriptObject runtimeScope) {
+ this.compiler = compiler;
+ this.runtimeScope = runtimeScope;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Returns true if the expression can be safely evaluated, and its value is an object known to always use
+ * String as the type of its property names retrieved through
+ * {@link ScriptRuntime#toPropertyIterator(Object)}. It is used to avoid optimistic assumptions about its
+ * property name types.
+ * @param expr the expression to test
+ * @return true if the expression can be safely evaluated, and its value is an object known to always use
+ * String as the type of its property iterators.
+ */
+ boolean hasStringPropertyIterator(final Expression expr) {
+ return evaluateSafely(expr) instanceof ScriptObject;
+ }
+
+ Type getOptimisticType(final Optimistic node) {
+ assert compiler.useOptimisticTypes();
+
+ final int programPoint = node.getProgramPoint();
+ final Type validType = compiler.getInvalidatedProgramPointType(programPoint);
+
+ if (validType != null) {
+ return validType;
+ }
+
+ final Type mostOptimisticType = node.getMostOptimisticType();
+ final Type evaluatedType = getEvaluatedType(node);
+
+ if (evaluatedType != null) {
+ if (evaluatedType.widerThan(mostOptimisticType)) {
+ final Type newValidType = evaluatedType.isObject() || evaluatedType.isBoolean() ? Type.OBJECT : evaluatedType;
+ // Update invalidatedProgramPoints so we don't re-evaluate the expression next time. This is a heuristic
+ // as we're doing a tradeoff. Re-evaluating expressions on each recompile takes time, but it might
+ // notice a widening in the type of the expression and thus prevent an unnecessary deoptimization later.
+ // We'll presume though that the types of expressions are mostly stable, so if we evaluated it in one
+ // compilation, we'll keep to that and risk a low-probability deoptimization if its type gets widened
+ // in the future.
+ compiler.addInvalidatedProgramPoint(node.getProgramPoint(), newValidType);
+ }
+ return evaluatedType;
+ }
+ return mostOptimisticType;
+ }
+
+ private static Type getPropertyType(final ScriptObject sobj, final String name) {
+ final FindProperty find = sobj.findProperty(name, true);
+ if (find == null) {
+ return null;
+ }
+
+ final Property property = find.getProperty();
+ final Class<?> propertyClass = property.getType();
+ if (propertyClass == null) {
+ // propertyClass == null means its value is Undefined. It is probably not initialized yet, so we won't make
+ // a type assumption yet.
+ return null;
+ } else if (propertyClass.isPrimitive()) {
+ return Type.typeFor(propertyClass);
+ }
+
+ final ScriptObject owner = find.getOwner();
+ if (property.hasGetterFunction(owner)) {
+ // Can have side effects, so we can't safely evaluate it; since !propertyClass.isPrimitive(), it's Object.
+ return Type.OBJECT;
+ }
+
+ // Safely evaluate the property, and return the narrowest type for the actual value (e.g. Type.INT for a boxed
+ // integer).
+ final Object value = property.needsDeclaration() ? ScriptRuntime.UNDEFINED : property.getObjectValue(owner, owner);
+ if (value == ScriptRuntime.UNDEFINED) {
+ return null;
+ }
+ return Type.typeFor(JSType.unboxedFieldType(value));
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Declares a symbol name as belonging to a non-scoped local variable during an on-demand compilation of a single
+ * function. This method will add an explicit Undefined binding for the local into the runtime scope if it's
+ * otherwise implicitly undefined so that when an expression is evaluated for the name, it won't accidentally find
+ * an unrelated value higher up the scope chain. It is only required to call this method when doing an optimistic
+ * on-demand compilation.
+ * @param symbolName the name of the symbol that is to be declared as being a non-scoped local variable.
+ */
+ void declareLocalSymbol(final String symbolName) {
+ assert
+ compiler.useOptimisticTypes() &&
+ compiler.isOnDemandCompilation() &&
+ runtimeScope != null :
+ "useOptimistic=" +
+ compiler.useOptimisticTypes() +
+ " isOnDemand=" +
+ compiler.isOnDemandCompilation() +
+ " scope="+runtimeScope;
+
+ if (runtimeScope.findProperty(symbolName, false) == null) {
+ runtimeScope.addOwnProperty(symbolName, NOT_WRITABLE | NOT_ENUMERABLE | NOT_CONFIGURABLE, ScriptRuntime.UNDEFINED);
+ }
+ }
+
+ private Object evaluateSafely(final Expression expr) {
+ if (expr instanceof IdentNode) {
+ return runtimeScope == null ? null : evaluatePropertySafely(runtimeScope, ((IdentNode)expr).getName());
+ }
+
+ if (expr instanceof AccessNode) {
+ final AccessNode accessNode = (AccessNode)expr;
+ final Object base = evaluateSafely(accessNode.getBase());
+ if (!(base instanceof ScriptObject)) {
+ return null;
+ }
+ return evaluatePropertySafely((ScriptObject)base, accessNode.getProperty());
+ }
+
+ return null;
+ }
+
+ private static Object evaluatePropertySafely(final ScriptObject sobj, final String name) {
+ final FindProperty find = sobj.findProperty(name, true);
+ if (find == null) {
+ return null;
+ }
+ final Property property = find.getProperty();
+ final ScriptObject owner = find.getOwner();
+ if (property.hasGetterFunction(owner)) {
+ // Possible side effects; can't evaluate safely
+ return null;
+ }
+ return property.getObjectValue(owner, owner);
+ }
+
+
+ private Type getEvaluatedType(final Optimistic expr) {
+ if (expr instanceof IdentNode) {
+ if (runtimeScope == null) {
+ return null;
+ }
+ return getPropertyType(runtimeScope, ((IdentNode)expr).getName());
+ } else if (expr instanceof AccessNode) {
+ final AccessNode accessNode = (AccessNode)expr;
+ final Object base = evaluateSafely(accessNode.getBase());
+ if (!(base instanceof ScriptObject)) {
+ return null;
+ }
+ return getPropertyType((ScriptObject)base, accessNode.getProperty());
+ } else if (expr instanceof IndexNode) {
+ final IndexNode indexNode = (IndexNode)expr;
+ final Object base = evaluateSafely(indexNode.getBase());
+ if(base instanceof NativeArray || base instanceof ArrayBufferView) {
+ // NOTE: optimistic array getters throw UnwarrantedOptimismException based on the type of their
+ // underlying array storage, not based on values of individual elements. Thus, a LongArrayData will
+ // throw UOE for every optimistic int linkage attempt, even if the long value being returned in the
+ // first invocation would be representable as int. That way, we can presume that the array's optimistic
+ // type is the most optimistic type for which an element getter has a chance of executing successfully.
+ return ((ScriptObject)base).getArray().getOptimisticType();
+ }
+ } else if (expr instanceof CallNode) {
+ // Currently, we'll only try to guess the return type of immediately invoked function expressions with no
+ // parameters, that is (function() { ... })(). We could do better, but these are all heuristics and we can
+ // gradually introduce them as needed. An easy one would be to do the same for .call(this) idiom.
+ final CallNode callExpr = (CallNode)expr;
+ final Expression fnExpr = callExpr.getFunction();
+ if (fnExpr instanceof FunctionNode) {
+ final FunctionNode fn = (FunctionNode)fnExpr;
+ if (callExpr.getArgs().isEmpty()) {
+ final RecompilableScriptFunctionData data = compiler.getScriptFunctionData(fn.getId());
+ if (data != null) {
+ final Type returnType = Type.typeFor(data.getReturnType(EMPTY_INVOCATION_TYPE, runtimeScope));
+ if (returnType == Type.BOOLEAN) {
+ // We don't have optimistic booleans. In fact, optimistic call sites getting back boolean
+ // currently deoptimize all the way to Object.
+ return Type.OBJECT;
+ }
+ assert returnType == Type.INT || returnType == Type.LONG || returnType == Type.NUMBER || returnType == Type.OBJECT;
+ return returnType;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return null;
+ }
+}