perf annotate: Remove hist__account_cycles() from callback

The hist__account_cycles() function is executed when the
hist_iter__branch_callback() is called.

But it looks it's not necessary.  In hist__account_cycles, it already
walks on all branch entries.

This patch moves the hist__account_cycles out of callback, now the data
processing is much faster than before.

Previous code has an issue that the ch[offset].num++ (in
__symbol__account_cycles) is executed repeatedly since
hist__account_cycles is called in each hist_iter__branch_callback, so
the counting of ch[offset].num is not correct (too big).

With this patch, the issue is fixed. And we don't need the code of
"ch->reset >= ch->num / 2" to check if there are too many overlaps (in
annotation__count_and_fill), otherwise some data would be hidden.

Now, we can try, for example:

  perf record -b ...
  perf annotate or perf report -s symbol

The before/after output should be no change.

 v3:
 ---
 Fix the crash in stdio mode.
 Like previous code, it needs the checking of ui__has_annotation()
 before hist__account_cycles()

 v2:
 ---
 1. Cover the similar perf report
 2. Remove the checking code "ch->reset >= ch->num / 2"

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1552684577-29041-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index 4054eb1f98ac..91e27ac297c2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -136,9 +136,6 @@ static int hist_iter__report_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
 	if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
 		return 0;
 
-	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-			     rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
 	if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
 		bi = he->branch_info;
 		err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
@@ -181,9 +178,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
 	if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
 		return 0;
 
-	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-			     rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
 	bi = he->branch_info;
 	err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
 	if (err)
@@ -282,6 +276,11 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
 	if (al.map != NULL)
 		al.map->dso->hit = 1;
 
+	if (ui__has_annotation() || rep->symbol_ipc) {
+		hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, &al, sample,
+				     rep->nonany_branch_mode);
+	}
+
 	ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &al, rep->max_stack, rep);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		pr_debug("problem adding hist entry, skipping event\n");