aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDiego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>2004-05-13 06:41:07 +0000
committerDiego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com>2004-05-13 06:41:07 +0000
commit60ac8927839c69492fc46bf03880f34820cc0570 (patch)
treea2568888a519c077427b133de9ece5879a8484a5 /gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
parentfb7359384dbf6f77df81d6bc73b0b5943c52e6d6 (diff)
Merge tree-ssa-20020619-branch into mainline.
git-svn-id: https://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@81764 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c445
1 files changed, 445 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c50e879e975
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
@@ -0,0 +1,445 @@
+/* Forward propagation of single use variables.
+ Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+This file is part of GCC.
+
+GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option)
+any later version.
+
+GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+along with GCC; see the file COPYING. If not, write to
+the Free Software Foundation, 59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
+Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
+
+#include "config.h"
+#include "system.h"
+#include "coretypes.h"
+#include "tm.h"
+#include "errors.h"
+#include "ggc.h"
+#include "tree.h"
+#include "rtl.h"
+#include "tm_p.h"
+#include "basic-block.h"
+#include "timevar.h"
+#include "diagnostic.h"
+#include "tree-flow.h"
+#include "tree-pass.h"
+#include "tree-dump.h"
+
+/* This pass performs simple forward propagation of single use variables
+ from their definition site into their single use site.
+
+ Right now we only bother forward propagating into COND_EXPRs since those
+ are relatively common cases where forward propagation creates valid
+ gimple code without the expression needing to fold. ie
+
+ bb0:
+ x = a COND b;
+ if (x) goto ... else goto ...
+
+ Will be transformed into:
+
+ bb0:
+ if (a COND b) goto ... else goto ...
+
+ Similarly for the tests (x == 0), (x != 0), (x == 1) and (x != 1).
+
+ Or (assuming c1 and c2 are constants):
+
+ bb0:
+ x = a + c1;
+ if (x EQ/NEQ c2) goto ... else goto ...
+
+ Will be transformed into:
+
+ bb0:
+ if (a EQ/NEQ (c2 - c1)) goto ... else goto ...
+
+ Similarly for x = a - c1.
+
+ Or
+
+ bb0:
+ x = !a
+ if (x) goto ... else goto ...
+
+ Will be transformed into:
+
+ bb0:
+ if (a == 0) goto ... else goto ...
+
+ Similarly for the tests (x == 0), (x != 0), (x == 1) and (x != 1).
+ For these cases, we propagate A into all, possibly more than one,
+ COND_EXPRs that use X.
+
+ In addition to eliminating the variable and the statement which assigns
+ a value to the variable, we may be able to later thread the jump without
+ adding insane complexity in the dominator optimizer.
+
+ This will (of course) be extended as other needs arise. */
+
+/* Bitmap of variables for which we want immediate uses. This is set
+ by record_single_argument_cond_exprs and tested in need_imm_uses_for. */
+static bitmap vars;
+
+static bool need_imm_uses_for (tree);
+static void tree_ssa_forward_propagate_single_use_vars (void);
+static varray_type record_single_argument_cond_exprs (void);
+static void substitute_single_use_vars (varray_type);
+
+/* Function indicating whether we ought to include information for 'var'
+ when calculating immediate uses. */
+
+static bool
+need_imm_uses_for (tree var)
+{
+ return bitmap_bit_p (vars, SSA_NAME_VERSION (var));
+}
+
+/* Find all COND_EXPRs with a condition that is a naked SSA_NAME or
+ an equality comparison against a constant.
+
+ Record the identified COND_EXPRs and the SSA_NAME used in the COND_EXPR
+ into a virtual array, which is returned to the caller. Also record
+ into VARS that we will need immediate uses for the identified SSA_NAME.
+
+ The more uninteresting COND_EXPRs and associated SSA_NAMEs we can
+ filter out here, the faster this pass will run since its runtime is
+ dominated by the time to build immediate uses. */
+
+static varray_type
+record_single_argument_cond_exprs (void)
+{
+ basic_block bb;
+ varray_type retval;
+
+ vars = BITMAP_XMALLOC ();
+
+ VARRAY_TREE_INIT (retval, 10, "forward propagation vars");
+
+ /* The first pass over the blocks gathers the set of variables we need
+ immediate uses for as well as the set of interesting COND_EXPRs.
+
+ A simpler implementation may be appropriate if/when we have a lower
+ overhead means of getting immediate use information. */
+ FOR_EACH_BB (bb)
+ {
+ tree last = last_stmt (bb);
+
+ /* See if this block ends in a COND_EXPR. */
+ if (last && TREE_CODE (last) == COND_EXPR)
+ {
+ tree cond = COND_EXPR_COND (last);
+ enum tree_code cond_code = TREE_CODE (cond);
+
+ /* If the condition is a lone variable or an equality test of
+ an SSA_NAME against an integral constant, then we may have an
+ optimizable case.
+
+ Note these conditions also ensure the COND_EXPR has no
+ virtual operands or other side effects. */
+ if (cond_code == SSA_NAME
+ || ((cond_code == EQ_EXPR || cond_code == NE_EXPR)
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0)) == SSA_NAME
+ && TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1))) == 'c'
+ && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)))))
+ {
+ tree def;
+ tree test_var;
+
+ /* Extract the single variable used in the test into TEST_VAR. */
+ if (cond_code == SSA_NAME)
+ test_var = cond;
+ else
+ test_var = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
+
+ /* If we have already recorded this SSA_NAME as interesting,
+ do not do so again. */
+ if (bitmap_bit_p (vars, SSA_NAME_VERSION (test_var)))
+ continue;
+
+ /* Now get the defining statement for TEST_VAR and see if it
+ something we are interested in. */
+ def = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (test_var);
+ if (TREE_CODE (def) == MODIFY_EXPR)
+ {
+ tree def_rhs = TREE_OPERAND (def, 1);
+
+ /* If TEST_VAR is set by adding or subtracting a constant
+ from an SSA_NAME, then it is interesting to us as we
+ can adjust the constant in the conditional and thus
+ eliminate the arithmetic operation. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (def_rhs) == PLUS_EXPR
+ || TREE_CODE (def_rhs) == MINUS_EXPR)
+ {
+ tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0);
+ tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 1);
+
+ /* The first operand must be an SSA_NAME and the second
+ operand must be a constant. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (op0) != SSA_NAME
+ || TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (op1)) != 'c'
+ || !INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op1)))
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* These cases require comparisons of a naked SSA_NAME or
+ comparison of an SSA_NAME against zero or one. */
+ else if (TREE_CODE (cond) == SSA_NAME
+ || integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1))
+ || integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)))
+ {
+ /* If TEST_VAR is set from a relational operation
+ between two SSA_NAMEs or a combination of an SSA_NAME
+ and a constant, then it is interesting. */
+ if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (def_rhs)) == '<')
+ {
+ tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0);
+ tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 1);
+
+ /* Both operands of DEF_RHS must be SSA_NAMEs or
+ constants. */
+ if ((TREE_CODE (op0) != SSA_NAME
+ && !is_gimple_min_invariant (op0))
+ || (TREE_CODE (op1) != SSA_NAME
+ && !is_gimple_min_invariant (op1)))
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* If TEST_VAR is set from a TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, then it
+ is interesting. */
+ else if (TREE_CODE (def_rhs) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR)
+ {
+ def_rhs = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0);
+
+ /* DEF_RHS must be an SSA_NAME or constant. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (def_rhs) != SSA_NAME
+ && !is_gimple_min_invariant (def_rhs))
+ continue;
+ }
+ else
+ continue;
+ }
+ else
+ continue;
+
+ /* All the tests passed, record TEST_VAR as interesting. */
+ VARRAY_PUSH_TREE (retval, test_var);
+ bitmap_set_bit (vars, SSA_NAME_VERSION (test_var));
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ return retval;
+}
+
+/* Given FORWPROP_DATA containing SSA_NAMEs which are used in COND_EXPRs
+ that we may be able to optimize, attempt to rewrite the condition
+ in each COND_EXPR to use the RHS of the statement which defines the
+ SSA_NAME used in the COND_EXPR. */
+
+static void
+substitute_single_use_vars (varray_type forwprop_data)
+{
+ unsigned int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < VARRAY_ACTIVE_SIZE (forwprop_data); i++)
+ {
+ tree test_var = VARRAY_TREE (forwprop_data, i);
+ tree def = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (test_var);
+ dataflow_t df;
+ int j, num_uses, propagated_uses;
+ block_stmt_iterator bsi;
+
+ /* Now compute the immediate uses of TEST_VAR. */
+ df = get_immediate_uses (def);
+ num_uses = num_immediate_uses (df);
+ propagated_uses = 0;
+
+ /* If TEST_VAR is used more than once and is not a boolean set
+ via TRUTH_NOT_EXPR with another SSA_NAME as its argument, then
+ we can not optimize. */
+ if (num_uses == 1
+ || (TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (test_var)) == BOOLEAN_TYPE
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (def, 1)) == TRUTH_NOT_EXPR
+ && (TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (TREE_OPERAND (def, 1), 0))
+ == SSA_NAME)))
+ ;
+ else
+ continue;
+
+ /* Walk over each use and try to forward propagate the RHS of
+ DEF into the use. */
+ for (j = 0; j < num_uses; j++)
+ {
+ tree cond_stmt;
+ tree cond;
+ enum tree_code cond_code;
+ tree def_rhs;
+ enum tree_code def_rhs_code;
+ tree new_cond;
+
+ cond_stmt = immediate_use (df, j);
+
+ /* For now we can only propagate into COND_EXPRs. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (cond_stmt) != COND_EXPR)
+ continue;
+
+ cond = COND_EXPR_COND (cond_stmt);
+ cond_code = TREE_CODE (cond);
+ def_rhs = TREE_OPERAND (def, 1);
+ def_rhs_code = TREE_CODE (def_rhs);
+
+ /* If the definition of the single use variable was from an
+ arithmetic operation, then we just need to adjust the
+ constant in the COND_EXPR_COND and update the variable tested. */
+ if (def_rhs_code == PLUS_EXPR || def_rhs_code == MINUS_EXPR)
+ {
+ tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0);
+ tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 1);
+ enum tree_code new_code;
+ tree t;
+
+ /* If the variable was defined via X + C, then we must subtract
+ C from the constant in the conditional. Otherwise we add
+ C to the constant in the conditional. The result must fold
+ into a valid gimple operand to be optimizable. */
+ new_code = def_rhs_code == PLUS_EXPR ? MINUS_EXPR : PLUS_EXPR;
+ t = int_const_binop (new_code, TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1), op1, 0);
+ if (!is_gimple_val (t))
+ continue;
+
+ new_cond = build (cond_code, boolean_type_node, op0, t);
+ }
+ /* If the variable is defined by a conditional expression... */
+ else if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (def_rhs_code) == '<')
+ {
+ /* TEST_VAR was set from a relational operator. */
+ tree op0 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0);
+ tree op1 = TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 1);
+
+ new_cond = build (def_rhs_code, boolean_type_node, op0, op1);
+
+ /* Invert the conditional if necessary. */
+ if ((cond_code == EQ_EXPR
+ && integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)))
+ || (cond_code == NE_EXPR
+ && integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1))))
+ {
+ new_cond = invert_truthvalue (new_cond);
+
+ /* If we did not get a simple relational expression or
+ bare SSA_NAME, then we can not optimize this case. */
+ if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (new_cond)) != '<'
+ && TREE_CODE (new_cond) != SSA_NAME)
+ continue;
+ }
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* TEST_VAR was set from a TRUTH_NOT_EXPR. */
+ if (cond_code == SSA_NAME
+ || (cond_code == NE_EXPR
+ && integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)))
+ || (cond_code == EQ_EXPR
+ && integer_onep (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1))))
+ new_cond = build (EQ_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
+ TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0),
+ convert (TREE_TYPE (def_rhs),
+ integer_zero_node));
+ else
+ new_cond = build (NE_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
+ TREE_OPERAND (def_rhs, 0),
+ convert (TREE_TYPE (def_rhs),
+ integer_zero_node));
+ }
+
+ /* Dump details. */
+ if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
+ {
+ fprintf (dump_file, " Replaced '");
+ print_generic_expr (dump_file, cond, dump_flags);
+ fprintf (dump_file, "' with '");
+ print_generic_expr (dump_file, new_cond, dump_flags);
+ fprintf (dump_file, "'\n");
+ }
+
+ /* Replace the condition. */
+ COND_EXPR_COND (cond_stmt) = new_cond;
+ modify_stmt (cond_stmt);
+ propagated_uses++;
+ }
+
+ /* If we propagated into all the uses, then we can delete DEF.
+ Unfortunately, we have to find the defining statement in
+ whatever block it might be in. */
+ if (num_uses && num_uses == propagated_uses)
+ for (bsi = bsi_start (bb_for_stmt (def));
+ !bsi_end_p (bsi);
+ bsi_next (&bsi))
+ {
+ if (def == bsi_stmt (bsi))
+ {
+ bsi_remove (&bsi);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+/* Main entry point for the forward propagation optimizer. */
+
+static void
+tree_ssa_forward_propagate_single_use_vars (void)
+{
+ varray_type forwprop_data;
+
+ /* First get a list of all the interesting COND_EXPRs and potential single
+ use variables which feed those COND_EXPRs. */
+ forwprop_data = record_single_argument_cond_exprs ();
+
+ /* Now compute immediate uses for all the variables we care about. */
+ compute_immediate_uses (TDFA_USE_OPS, need_imm_uses_for);
+
+ /* We are done with the VARS bitmap and other dataflow information. */
+ BITMAP_XFREE (vars);
+ vars = NULL;
+
+ /* And optimize. */
+ substitute_single_use_vars (forwprop_data);
+
+ /* All done. Clean up. */
+ free_df ();
+ VARRAY_CLEAR (forwprop_data);
+}
+
+
+static bool
+gate_forwprop (void)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+struct tree_opt_pass pass_forwprop = {
+ "forwprop", /* name */
+ gate_forwprop, /* gate */
+ tree_ssa_forward_propagate_single_use_vars, /* execute */
+ NULL, /* sub */
+ NULL, /* next */
+ 0, /* static_pass_number */
+ TV_TREE_FORWPROP, /* tv_id */
+ PROP_cfg | PROP_ssa, /* properties_required */
+ 0, /* properties_provided */
+ 0, /* properties_destroyed */
+ 0, /* todo_flags_start */
+ TODO_dump_func | TODO_ggc_collect /* todo_flags_finish */
+ | TODO_verify_ssa
+};