1 files changed, 1 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arg9.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arg9.C
index 809f2b76a4a..b3b753c1a91 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arg9.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.law/arg9.C
@@ -1,39 +1 @@
-// Build don't link: 
-// GROUPS passed arg-matching
-// arg-matching file
-// Message-Id: <199405132049.QAA06835@elan.cs.UMD.EDU>
-// Subject: Bug in g++ 2.4.5 and 2.5.8
-// Date: Fri, 13 May 1994 16:49:22 -0400
-// From: Evan Rosser <ejr@cs.umd.edu>
-
-#include <assert.h>
-#include <stdio.h>
-#include <stdlib.h>
-
-class TupleIterator {
-public:
-    TupleIterator(int *tpl);
-    int& operator*();
-    int  live() const;
-// The compile fails with "no post-increment operator for type" at "TI++"
-// below.
-// It succeeds with the same declarations if set_position does not take an int.
-// This occurs with G++ 2.4.5 and 2.5.8.
-// Sun CC works OK with either case.
-        void operator++(int);
-        void set_position(int);
-private:
-};
-
-main() {
-
-int t[5];
-t[1] = 1; t[2] = 2;t[3] = 3;t[4] = 4;
-TupleIterator TI(t);
-
-    while(TI.live()){
-        printf("%d", *TI);
-        TI++;
-    }
-}
-
+int main() {