1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
|
// g++ 1.37.1 bug 900428_01
// g++ fails to issue error messages for cases where an incomplete type
// object must be evaluated if the value of such an evaluation is not
// actually used in the given context.
// In the case where such an object is volatile, it is obvious that this
// could be a problem, however I believe that errors should be issued
// for such cases regardless of whether or not such values are volatile
// because the abstract semantics seem to require the evaluation of such
// values whether they are volatile or not.
// keywords: incomplete types, evaluation, volatile qualifier
// Build don't link:
int i;
void *pv;
volatile void *pvv;
struct s;
extern struct s es, *ps;
extern volatile struct s evs, *pvs;
void pv_test ()
{
*pv; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
(i ? *pv : *pv); // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
*pv, *pv; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
*pvv; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
(i ? *pvv : *pvv); // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
*pvv, *pvv; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
es; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
(i ? es : es); // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
es, es; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
evs; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
(i ? evs : evs); // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
evs, evs; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
*ps; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
(i ? *ps : *ps); // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
*ps, *ps; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
*pvs; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
(i ? *pvs : *pvs); // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
*pvs, *pvs; // ERROR - , XFAIL *-*-*
}
int main () { return 0; }
|
