diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-06-19 12:19:12 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-06-19 12:19:12 -0700 |
commit | 84bc1993e28b2d3cf6110bab0b625e8119825403 (patch) | |
tree | ed86c3c5d3e0a18294d300110cd80d1525f8fc7a /arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | |
parent | 98b769942c698e43117334332ebfed852dfa6ff9 (diff) | |
parent | 24ebec25fb270100e252b19c288e21bd7d8cc7f7 (diff) |
Merge tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux
Pull arm64 fixes from Will Deacon:
"Unfortunately, we still have a number of outstanding issues so there
will be more fixes to come, but this lot are a good start.
- Fix handling of watchpoints triggered by uaccess routines
- Fix initialisation of gigantic pages for CMA buffers
- Raise minimum clang version for BTI to avoid miscompilation
- Fix data race in SVE vector length configuration code
- Ensure address tags are ignored in kern_addr_valid()
- Dump register state on fatal BTI exception
- kexec_file() cleanup to use struct_size() macro"
* tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux:
arm64: hw_breakpoint: Don't invoke overflow handler on uaccess watchpoints
arm64: kexec_file: Use struct_size() in kmalloc()
arm64: mm: reserve hugetlb CMA after numa_init
arm64: bti: Require clang >= 10.0.1 for in-kernel BTI support
arm64: sve: Fix build failure when ARM64_SVE=y and SYSCTL=n
arm64: pgtable: Clear the GP bit for non-executable kernel pages
arm64: mm: reset address tag set by kasan sw tagging
arm64: traps: Dump registers prior to panic() in bad_mode()
arm64/sve: Eliminate data races on sve_default_vl
docs/arm64: Fix typo'd #define in sve.rst
arm64: remove TEXT_OFFSET randomization
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 44 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c index 0b727edf4104..af234a1e08b7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c @@ -730,6 +730,27 @@ static u64 get_distance_from_watchpoint(unsigned long addr, u64 val, return 0; } +static int watchpoint_report(struct perf_event *wp, unsigned long addr, + struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + int step = is_default_overflow_handler(wp); + struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(wp); + + info->trigger = addr; + + /* + * If we triggered a user watchpoint from a uaccess routine, then + * handle the stepping ourselves since userspace really can't help + * us with this. + */ + if (!user_mode(regs) && info->ctrl.privilege == AARCH64_BREAKPOINT_EL0) + step = 1; + else + perf_bp_event(wp, regs); + + return step; +} + static int watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs) { @@ -739,7 +760,6 @@ static int watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, u64 val; struct perf_event *wp, **slots; struct debug_info *debug_info; - struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info; struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl; slots = this_cpu_ptr(wp_on_reg); @@ -777,25 +797,13 @@ static int watchpoint_handler(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, if (dist != 0) continue; - info = counter_arch_bp(wp); - info->trigger = addr; - perf_bp_event(wp, regs); - - /* Do we need to handle the stepping? */ - if (is_default_overflow_handler(wp)) - step = 1; + step = watchpoint_report(wp, addr, regs); } - if (min_dist > 0 && min_dist != -1) { - /* No exact match found. */ - wp = slots[closest_match]; - info = counter_arch_bp(wp); - info->trigger = addr; - perf_bp_event(wp, regs); - /* Do we need to handle the stepping? */ - if (is_default_overflow_handler(wp)) - step = 1; - } + /* No exact match found? */ + if (min_dist > 0 && min_dist != -1) + step = watchpoint_report(slots[closest_match], addr, regs); + rcu_read_unlock(); if (!step) |