| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
ld/ChangeLog:
* NEWS: Fix 2 typos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprofng/Changelog:
2022-08-02 Ruud van der Pas <ruud.vanderpas@oracle.com>
PR gprofng/29410
* gp-display-html/gp-display-html.in: Remove non-breaking spaces.
|
|
|
|
The updates are to ensure that the .data section exists. This means
that we always have a data section. That means that we don't create a
RWX segment and avoid the corresponding warning.
We get this warning when testing aarch64-none-elf with -mcmodel=tiny.
N.b. this changes quite a few testcases from fail to pass.
|
|
|
|
* ctf-link.c (ctf_link_add_ctf_internal): Don't free uninitialised
pointers.
(cherry picked from commit 9ea6fffe1ebec9bd1929c708e044b765eabea258)
|
|
There is a problem with my commit 0e3c1eebb2, which replaced
bfd_uint64_t with uint64_t: Some hosts typedef int64_t to long long
even when long is the same size as long long. That confuses the code
choosing one of "l", "ll", or "I64" for BFD_VMA_FMT, and results in
warnings.
Write a direct configure test for the printf int64_t style instead.
This removes the last use of BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG, so delete that.
Note that the changes to configure.com are pure guesswork.
PR 29348
* bfd-in.h (BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG): Don't define.
(BFD_VMA_FMT): Define using BFD_INT64_FMT when 64-bit.
(bfd_vma, bfd_signed_vma): Move comments to 64-bit typedefs.
* configure.ac (BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG): Delete.
(BFD_INT64_FMT): New config test.
* configure.com: Update similarly.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* bfd-in2.h: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
(cherry picked from commit 1a5178fe284547ef2abd8ae66588c9999d61c524)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DW_FORM_loclistx attribute formats.
PR 29424
* dwarf2.c (read_attribute_value): Handle DW_FORM_rnglistx and
DW_FORM_loclistx.
|
|
As discussed in PR ld/29411, the ld warning
[...] has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions
needs to be disabled on all SPARC targets, not just Solaris/SPARC: the
.plt section is required to be RWX by the 32-bit SPARC ELF psABI and the
64-bit SPARC Compliance Definition 2.4.1. Given that ld only supports
SPARC ELF targets, this patch implements this.
Tested on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu and sparc-sun-solaris2.11.
2022-07-28 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
ld:
PR ld/29411
* configure.tgt (ac_default_ld_warn_rwx_segments): Extend to all
sparc targets. Expand comment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprofng/ChangeLog
2022-07-25 Vladimir Mezentsev <vladimir.mezentsev@oracle.com>
PR gprofng/29368
* configure.ac: Check for the makeinfo version.
* configure: Rebuild.
|
|
PR 29411
* configure.tgt (ac_default_ld_warn_rwx_segments): Disable for
sparc-solaris configurations.
|
|
Three pppc32 ld tests fail when spu support is included in the linker
due to this snippet in ld/emulparams/elf32ppc.sh.
if grep -q 'ld_elf32_spu_emulation' ldemul-list.h; then
DATA_START_SYMBOLS="${RELOCATING+*crt1.o(.data .data.* .gnu.linkonce.d.*)
PROVIDE (__spe_handle = .);
*(.data.spehandle)
. += 4 * (DEFINED (__spe_handle) || . != 0);}"
fi
* testsuite/ld-powerpc/tlsexe32.r: Pass with .data section present.
* testsuite/ld-powerpc/tlsexe32no.r: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-powerpc/tlsso32.r: Likewise.
(cherry picked from commit c138af95731c630a78329fd86076992f82099957)
|
|
|
|
|
|
gprofng/Changelog:
2022-07-22 Ruud van der Pas <ruud.vanderpas@oracle.com>
PR gprofng/29356
* gp-display-html/gp-display-html.in: fixed a problem to execute
gp-display-text in case gprofng is not included in the search
path.
|
|
gprofng/Changelog:
2022-07-22 Ruud van der Pas <ruud.vanderpas@oracle.com>
PR gprofng/29392
* gp-display-html/gp-display-html.in: modified a regex, plus the
code to handle the results; renamed a variable to improve the
consistency in naming.
|
|
gprofng/Changelog:
2022-07-22 Ruud van der Pas <ruud.vanderpas@oracle.com>
PR gprofng/29353
* gp-display-html/gp-display-html.in: fixed a problem in the
generation of html for the disassembly where instructions
without arguments were not handled correctly.
|
|
non-portable
gprofng/Changelog:
2022-07-22 Ruud van der Pas <ruud.vanderpas@oracle.com>
PR gprofng/29352
* gp-display-html/gp-display-html.in: the hex subroutine from
the bigint module is now used.
|
|
gprofng/Changelog:
2022-07-22 Ruud van der Pas <ruud.vanderpas@oracle.com>
PR gprofng/29351
* gp-display-html/gp-display-html.in: the dynamic loading of
modules occurred too early, resulting in the generation of the
man page to fail in case a module is missing; the loading part is
now done somewhat later in the execution to avoid this problem.
|
|
Since glibc 2.36 will issue warnings for copy relocation against
protected symbols and non-canonical reference to canonical protected
functions, change the linker to always disallow such relocations.
bfd/
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_scan_relocs): Remove check for
elf_has_indirect_extern_access.
* elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_scan_relocs): Likewise.
(elf_x86_64_relocate_section): Remove check for
elf_has_no_copy_on_protected.
* elfxx-x86.c (elf_x86_allocate_dynrelocs): Check for building
executable instead of elf_has_no_copy_on_protected.
(_bfd_x86_elf_adjust_dynamic_symbol): Disallow copy relocation
against non-copyable protected symbol.
* elfxx-x86.h (SYMBOL_NO_COPYRELOC): Remove check for
elf_has_no_copy_on_protected.
ld/
* testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Expect linker error for PR ld/17709
test.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr17709.rd: Removed.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr17709.err: New file.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17709.rd: Removed.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17709.err: New file.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr28875-func.err: Updated.
* testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.exp: Expect linker error for PR
ld/17709 test. Add tests for function pointer against protected
function.
(cherry picked from commit f638657759f5b9b4eb31a1aa6b9fe6e6fb01f4a0)
|
|
Call _bfd_elf_symbol_refs_local_p with local_protected==true. This has
2 noticeable effects for -shared:
* GOT-generating relocations referencing a protected data symbol no
longer lead to a GLOB_DAT (similar to a hidden symbol).
* Direct access relocations (e.g. R_X86_64_PC32) no longer has the
confusing diagnostic below.
__attribute__((visibility("protected"))) void *foo() {
return (void *)foo;
}
// gcc -fpic -shared -fuse-ld=bfd
relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against protected symbol `foo' can not be used when making a shared object
The new behavior matches arm, aarch64 (commit
83c325007c5599fa9b60b8d5f7b84842160e1d1b), and powerpc ports, and other
linkers: gold and ld.lld.
Note: if some code tries to use direct access relocations to take the
address of foo, the pointer equality will break, but the error should be
reported on the executable link, not on the innocent shared object link.
glibc 2.36 will give a warning at relocation resolving time.
With this change, `#define elf_backend_extern_protected_data 1` is no
longer effective. Just remove it.
Remove the test "Run protected-func-1 without PIE" since -fno-pic
address taken operation in the executable doesn't work with protected
symbol in a shared object by default. Similarly, remove
protected-data-1a and protected-data-1b. protected-data-1b can be made
working by removing HAVE_LD_PIE_COPYRELOC from GCC
(https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/596678.html).
(cherry picked from commit d19a265487eda186b6977d9d15648cda9fad3298)
|
|
On seeing PR29369 my suspicion was naturally on a recent powerpc64
change, commit 0ab80031430e. Without a reproducer, I spent time
wondering what could have gone wrong, and while I doubt this patch
would have fixed the PR, there are some improvements that can be made
to cater for user silliness.
I also noticed that when -z relro -z now sections are created out of
order, with .got before .plt in the section headers but .got is laid
out at a higher address. That's due to the address expression for
.branch_lt referencing SIZEOF(.got) and so calling init_os (which
creates a bfd section) for .got before the .plt section is created.
Fix that by ignoring SIZEOF in exp_init_os. Unlike ADDR and LOADADDR
which need to reference section vma and lma respectively, SIZEOF can
and does cope with a missing bfd section by returning zero for its
size, which of course is correct.
PR 29369
* ldlang.c (exp_init_os): Don't create a bfd section for SIZEOF.
* emulparams/elf64ppc.sh (OTHER_RELRO_SECTIONS_2): Revise
.branch_lt address to take into account possible user sections
with alignment larger than 8 bytes.
(cherry picked from commit 5d471bd907be60e9858b22cdf4fd10ddc0f6ee1a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can't use the PLT entry as the function address for PIC since the PIC
register may not be set up properly for indirect call.
bfd/
PR ld/27998
* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Don't allow GOTOFF
relocation against IFUNC symbol for PIC.
ld/
PR ld/27998
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr27998a.d: Replace -shared with -e bar.
* testsuite/ld-i386/pr27998b.d: Expect a linker error.
* testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-i386-now.d: Updated.
* testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-local-i386-now.d: Likewise.
* testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-i386.s: Replace @GOTOFF with @GOT.
* testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-2-local-i386.s: Likewise.
(cherry picked from commit 8f29211c3f0a6335c17e0a90396c146facf6dba4)
|
|
|
|
The MMA instructions use XX3_MASK|3<<21 as an instruction mask, but that
misses the RC bit/bit 31, so if we disassemble a .long that represents an
MMA instruction except that it also has bit 31 set, we will erroneously
disassemble it to that MMA instruction. We create new masks defines that
contain bit 31 so that doesn't happen anymore.
opcodes/
* ppc-opc.c (XACC_MASK, XX3ACC_MASK): New defines.
(P_GER_MASK, xxmfacc, xxmtacc, xxsetaccz, xvi8ger4pp, xvi8ger4,
xvf16ger2pp, xvf16ger2, xvf32gerpp, xvf32ger, xvi4ger8pp, xvi4ger8,
xvi16ger2spp, xvi16ger2s, xvbf16ger2pp, xvbf16ger2, xvf64gerpp,
xvf64ger, xvi16ger2, xvf16ger2np, xvf32gernp, xvi8ger4spp, xvi16ger2pp,
xvbf16ger2np, xvf64gernp, xvf16ger2pn, xvf32gerpn, xvbf16ger2pn,
xvf64gerpn, xvf16ger2nn, xvf32gernn, xvbf16ger2nn, xvf64gernn: Use them.
(cherry picked from commit 0a246853439422e12a0ccb9191be638aab3987eb)
|
|
A standalone (without SAE) StaticRounding attribute is meaningless, and
indeed all other similar insns have ATTSyntax there instead. I can only
assume this was some strange copy-and-paste mistake.
(cherry picked from commit ea09fe92596fbb2a5da4595459bfe8b23789ec8d)
|
|
I clearly screwed up in 6ff00b5e12e7 ("x86/Intel: correct permitted
operand sizes for AVX512 scatter/gather") giving all AVX512F scatter
insns Dword element size. Update testcases (also their gather parts),
utilizing that there previously were two identical lines each (for no
apparent reason).
(cherry picked from commit 987e8a90fa6541d57b42fef95fae0a7da5a2c9bc)
|
|
PR 29390
binutils/
* dwarf.c (is_aarch64, DW_CFA_GNU_window_save_name): New.
(display_debug_frames): Use them.
(init_dwarf_regnames_aarch64): Set is_aarch64.
(init_dwarf_regnames_by_elf_machine_code): Clear is_aarch64.
(init_dwarf_regnames_by_bfd_arch_and_mach): Likewise.
gas/
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/pac_ab_key.d: Adjust expected output.
* testsuite/gas/aarch64/pac_negate_ra_state.d: Likewise.
(cherry picked from commit e4e340a3ff2ccc825f4a40abf947cdf32b3fdbbf)
|
|
Commit 244e19c79111 changed a number of variables in display_gdb_index
to count entries rather than words.
PR 29337
* dwarf.c (display_gdb_index): Correct use of cu_list_elements.
(cherry picked from commit e82295b23d0e52b0dadffb8c0d0b99462cd20fa8)
|
|
elf64-ppc.c:11673:33: error: format ‘%lx’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 3 has type ‘bfd_vma’ {aka ‘long long unsigned int’} [-Werror=format=]
11673 | fprintf (stderr, "offset = %#lx:", stub_entry->stub_offset);
| ~~~^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| | |
| | bfd_vma {aka long long unsigned int}
| long unsigned int
| %#llx
* elf64-ppc.c (dump_stub): Use BFD_VMA_FMT.
(cherry picked from commit 590207aa6ece509eabbc7a51aab87e5d9bcfc869)
|
