aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2014-01-20 10:25:12 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2014-01-20 10:25:12 -0800
commita693c46e14c9fdadbcd68ddfa94a4f72495531a9 (patch)
treeae8cd363c78959159b3b897b13c2d78c6923d355 /Documentation
parent6ffbe7d1fabddc768724656f159759cae7818cd9 (diff)
parent73a7ac2808fa52bdab1781646568b6f90c3d7034 (diff)
Merge branch 'core-rcu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull RCU updates from Ingo Molnar: - add RCU torture scripts/tooling - static analysis improvements - update RCU documentation - miscellaneous fixes * 'core-rcu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (52 commits) rcu: Remove "extern" from function declarations in kernel/rcu/rcu.h rcu: Remove "extern" from function declarations in include/linux/*rcu*.h rcu/torture: Dynamically allocate SRCU output buffer to avoid overflow rcu: Don't activate RCU core on NO_HZ_FULL CPUs rcu: Warn on allegedly impossible rcu_read_unlock_special() from irq rcu: Add an RCU_INITIALIZER for global RCU-protected pointers rcu: Make rcu_assign_pointer's assignment volatile and type-safe bonding: Use RCU_INIT_POINTER() for better overhead and for sparse rcu: Add comment on evaluate-once properties of rcu_assign_pointer(). rcu: Provide better diagnostics for blocking in RCU callback functions rcu: Improve SRCU's grace-period comments rcu: Fix CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_EXACT for odd fanout/leaf values rcu: Fix coccinelle warnings rcutorture: Stop tracking FSF's postal address rcutorture: Move checkarg to functions.sh rcutorture: Flag errors and warnings with color coding rcutorture: Record results from repeated runs of the same test scenario rcutorture: Test summary at end of run with less chattiness rcutorture: Update comment in kvm.sh listing typical RCU trace events rcutorture: Add tracing-enabled version of TREE08 ...
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/RCU/trace.txt22
-rw-r--r--Documentation/circular-buffers.txt45
-rw-r--r--Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt9
3 files changed, 44 insertions, 32 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
index f3778f8952d..910870b15ac 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
@@ -396,14 +396,14 @@ o Each element of the form "3/3 ..>. 0:7 ^0" represents one rcu_node
The output of "cat rcu/rcu_sched/rcu_pending" looks as follows:
- 0!np=26111 qsp=29 rpq=5386 cbr=1 cng=570 gpc=3674 gps=577 nn=15903
- 1!np=28913 qsp=35 rpq=6097 cbr=1 cng=448 gpc=3700 gps=554 nn=18113
- 2!np=32740 qsp=37 rpq=6202 cbr=0 cng=476 gpc=4627 gps=546 nn=20889
- 3 np=23679 qsp=22 rpq=5044 cbr=1 cng=415 gpc=3403 gps=347 nn=14469
- 4!np=30714 qsp=4 rpq=5574 cbr=0 cng=528 gpc=3931 gps=639 nn=20042
- 5 np=28910 qsp=2 rpq=5246 cbr=0 cng=428 gpc=4105 gps=709 nn=18422
- 6!np=38648 qsp=5 rpq=7076 cbr=0 cng=840 gpc=4072 gps=961 nn=25699
- 7 np=37275 qsp=2 rpq=6873 cbr=0 cng=868 gpc=3416 gps=971 nn=25147
+ 0!np=26111 qsp=29 rpq=5386 cbr=1 cng=570 gpc=3674 gps=577 nn=15903 ndw=0
+ 1!np=28913 qsp=35 rpq=6097 cbr=1 cng=448 gpc=3700 gps=554 nn=18113 ndw=0
+ 2!np=32740 qsp=37 rpq=6202 cbr=0 cng=476 gpc=4627 gps=546 nn=20889 ndw=0
+ 3 np=23679 qsp=22 rpq=5044 cbr=1 cng=415 gpc=3403 gps=347 nn=14469 ndw=0
+ 4!np=30714 qsp=4 rpq=5574 cbr=0 cng=528 gpc=3931 gps=639 nn=20042 ndw=0
+ 5 np=28910 qsp=2 rpq=5246 cbr=0 cng=428 gpc=4105 gps=709 nn=18422 ndw=0
+ 6!np=38648 qsp=5 rpq=7076 cbr=0 cng=840 gpc=4072 gps=961 nn=25699 ndw=0
+ 7 np=37275 qsp=2 rpq=6873 cbr=0 cng=868 gpc=3416 gps=971 nn=25147 ndw=0
The fields are as follows:
@@ -432,6 +432,10 @@ o "gpc" is the number of times that an old grace period had
o "gps" is the number of times that a new grace period had started,
but this CPU was not yet aware of it.
+o "ndw" is the number of times that a wakeup of an rcuo
+ callback-offload kthread had to be deferred in order to avoid
+ deadlock.
+
o "nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing.
@@ -443,7 +447,7 @@ The output of "cat rcu/rcuboost" looks as follows:
balk: nt=0 egt=6541 bt=0 nb=0 ny=126 nos=0
This information is output only for rcu_preempt. Each two-line entry
-corresponds to a leaf rcu_node strcuture. The fields are as follows:
+corresponds to a leaf rcu_node structure. The fields are as follows:
o "n:m" is the CPU-number range for the corresponding two-line
entry. In the sample output above, the first entry covers
diff --git a/Documentation/circular-buffers.txt b/Documentation/circular-buffers.txt
index 8117e5bf606..88951b17926 100644
--- a/Documentation/circular-buffers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/circular-buffers.txt
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ The producer will look something like this:
spin_lock(&producer_lock);
unsigned long head = buffer->head;
+ /* The spin_unlock() and next spin_lock() provide needed ordering. */
unsigned long tail = ACCESS_ONCE(buffer->tail);
if (CIRC_SPACE(head, tail, buffer->size) >= 1) {
@@ -168,9 +169,8 @@ The producer will look something like this:
produce_item(item);
- smp_wmb(); /* commit the item before incrementing the head */
-
- buffer->head = (head + 1) & (buffer->size - 1);
+ smp_store_release(buffer->head,
+ (head + 1) & (buffer->size - 1));
/* wake_up() will make sure that the head is committed before
* waking anyone up */
@@ -183,9 +183,14 @@ This will instruct the CPU that the contents of the new item must be written
before the head index makes it available to the consumer and then instructs the
CPU that the revised head index must be written before the consumer is woken.
-Note that wake_up() doesn't have to be the exact mechanism used, but whatever
-is used must guarantee a (write) memory barrier between the update of the head
-index and the change of state of the consumer, if a change of state occurs.
+Note that wake_up() does not guarantee any sort of barrier unless something
+is actually awakened. We therefore cannot rely on it for ordering. However,
+there is always one element of the array left empty. Therefore, the
+producer must produce two elements before it could possibly corrupt the
+element currently being read by the consumer. Therefore, the unlock-lock
+pair between consecutive invocations of the consumer provides the necessary
+ordering between the read of the index indicating that the consumer has
+vacated a given element and the write by the producer to that same element.
THE CONSUMER
@@ -195,21 +200,20 @@ The consumer will look something like this:
spin_lock(&consumer_lock);
- unsigned long head = ACCESS_ONCE(buffer->head);
+ /* Read index before reading contents at that index. */
+ unsigned long head = smp_load_acquire(buffer->head);
unsigned long tail = buffer->tail;
if (CIRC_CNT(head, tail, buffer->size) >= 1) {
- /* read index before reading contents at that index */
- smp_read_barrier_depends();
/* extract one item from the buffer */
struct item *item = buffer[tail];
consume_item(item);
- smp_mb(); /* finish reading descriptor before incrementing tail */
-
- buffer->tail = (tail + 1) & (buffer->size - 1);
+ /* Finish reading descriptor before incrementing tail. */
+ smp_store_release(buffer->tail,
+ (tail + 1) & (buffer->size - 1));
}
spin_unlock(&consumer_lock);
@@ -218,12 +222,17 @@ This will instruct the CPU to make sure the index is up to date before reading
the new item, and then it shall make sure the CPU has finished reading the item
before it writes the new tail pointer, which will erase the item.
-
-Note the use of ACCESS_ONCE() in both algorithms to read the opposition index.
-This prevents the compiler from discarding and reloading its cached value -
-which some compilers will do across smp_read_barrier_depends(). This isn't
-strictly needed if you can be sure that the opposition index will _only_ be
-used the once.
+Note the use of ACCESS_ONCE() and smp_load_acquire() to read the
+opposition index. This prevents the compiler from discarding and
+reloading its cached value - which some compilers will do across
+smp_read_barrier_depends(). This isn't strictly needed if you can
+be sure that the opposition index will _only_ be used the once.
+The smp_load_acquire() additionally forces the CPU to order against
+subsequent memory references. Similarly, smp_store_release() is used
+in both algorithms to write the thread's index. This documents the
+fact that we are writing to something that can be read concurrently,
+prevents the compiler from tearing the store, and enforces ordering
+against previous accesses.
===============
diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
index b9e9bd85429..0940078edeb 100644
--- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
+++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
@@ -2627,7 +2627,6 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
for RCU-preempt, and "s" for RCU-sched, and "N"
is the CPU number. This reduces OS jitter on the
offloaded CPUs, which can be useful for HPC and
-
real-time workloads. It can also improve energy
efficiency for asymmetric multiprocessors.
@@ -2643,8 +2642,8 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
periodically wake up to do the polling.
rcutree.blimit= [KNL]
- Set maximum number of finished RCU callbacks to process
- in one batch.
+ Set maximum number of finished RCU callbacks to
+ process in one batch.
rcutree.rcu_fanout_leaf= [KNL]
Increase the number of CPUs assigned to each
@@ -2663,8 +2662,8 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
value is one, and maximum value is HZ.
rcutree.qhimark= [KNL]
- Set threshold of queued
- RCU callbacks over which batch limiting is disabled.
+ Set threshold of queued RCU callbacks beyond which
+ batch limiting is disabled.
rcutree.qlowmark= [KNL]
Set threshold of queued RCU callbacks below which