aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/firewire
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>2011-03-11 04:17:27 +0300
committerStefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>2011-03-14 23:30:57 +0100
commitd838d2c09af0820e306e3e9e31f97e873823b0b4 (patch)
treeb51cb6854bac7282c925f67b612ee22e946445c2 /drivers/firewire
parentb6258fc1feabda868694ad5fdc7ca8edf3ef30ec (diff)
firewire: ohci: Misleading kfree in ohci.c::pci_probe/remove
It seems drivers/firewire/ohci.c is making some optimistic assumptions about struct fw_ohci and that member "card" will always remain the first member of the struct. Plus it's probably going to confuse a lot of static code analyzers too. So I wonder if there is a good reason not to free the ohci struct just like it was allocated instead of the tricky &ohci->card way? Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> It is perhaps just a rudiment from before mainline submission of the driver. Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/firewire')
-rw-r--r--drivers/firewire/ohci.c4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/firewire/ohci.c b/drivers/firewire/ohci.c
index 8f1e3ce930d..f903d7b6f34 100644
--- a/drivers/firewire/ohci.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/ohci.c
@@ -3309,7 +3309,7 @@ static int __devinit pci_probe(struct pci_dev *dev,
fail_disable:
pci_disable_device(dev);
fail_free:
- kfree(&ohci->card);
+ kfree(ohci);
pmac_ohci_off(dev);
fail:
if (err == -ENOMEM)
@@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ static void pci_remove(struct pci_dev *dev)
pci_iounmap(dev, ohci->registers);
pci_release_region(dev, 0);
pci_disable_device(dev);
- kfree(&ohci->card);
+ kfree(ohci);
pmac_ohci_off(dev);
fw_notify("Removed fw-ohci device.\n");