diff options
| author | Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> | 2012-06-29 11:33:12 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de> | 2012-07-17 10:31:39 +0200 |
| commit | 7ecc45e3ef8468abb062be2a8bb427029342f42d (patch) | |
| tree | b161f84f121bc15ed6d1a511da1be5984721069f /drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | |
| parent | 49099c4991da3c94773f888aea2e9d27b8a7c6d1 (diff) | |
drm/radeon: add error handling to fence_wait_empty_locked
Instead of returning the error handle it directly
and while at it fix the comments about the ring lock.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 33 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c index 7b55625a5e1..be4e4f390e8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c @@ -440,14 +440,11 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_any(struct radeon_device *rdev, return 0; } +/* caller must hold ring lock */ int radeon_fence_wait_next_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { uint64_t seq; - /* We are not protected by ring lock when reading current seq but - * it's ok as worst case is we return to early while we could have - * wait. - */ seq = atomic64_read(&rdev->fence_drv[ring].last_seq) + 1ULL; if (seq >= rdev->fence_drv[ring].sync_seq[ring]) { /* nothing to wait for, last_seq is @@ -457,15 +454,27 @@ int radeon_fence_wait_next_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) return radeon_fence_wait_seq(rdev, seq, ring, false, false); } -int radeon_fence_wait_empty_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) +/* caller must hold ring lock */ +void radeon_fence_wait_empty_locked(struct radeon_device *rdev, int ring) { - /* We are not protected by ring lock when reading current seq - * but it's ok as wait empty is call from place where no more - * activity can be scheduled so there won't be concurrent access - * to seq value. - */ - return radeon_fence_wait_seq(rdev, rdev->fence_drv[ring].sync_seq[ring], - ring, false, false); + uint64_t seq = rdev->fence_drv[ring].sync_seq[ring]; + + while(1) { + int r; + r = radeon_fence_wait_seq(rdev, seq, ring, false, false); + if (r == -EDEADLK) { + mutex_unlock(&rdev->ring_lock); + r = radeon_gpu_reset(rdev); + mutex_lock(&rdev->ring_lock); + if (!r) + continue; + } + if (r) { + dev_err(rdev->dev, "error waiting for ring to become" + " idle (%d)\n", r); + } + return; + } } struct radeon_fence *radeon_fence_ref(struct radeon_fence *fence) |