diff options
| author | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2012-07-26 16:24:50 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2012-07-27 08:23:28 +0200 |
| commit | 6af2d180f82151cf3d58952e35a4f96e45bc453a (patch) | |
| tree | 60530e9a2b917707bfc935043e3aa551d006a3fc /drivers/gpu | |
| parent | 9978cf50426bc8d386a0753f74ab895e4d6da554 (diff) | |
drm/i915: fix forcewake related hangs on snb
... by adding seemingly redudant posting reads.
This little dragon lair exploded the first time around when we've
refactored the code a bit to use the common wait_for_atomic_us in
"drm/i915: Group the GT routines together in both code and vtable",
which caused QA to file fdo bug #51738.
Chris Wilson entertained a few approaches to fixing #51738: Replacing
the udelay(1) with the previously-used udelay(10) (or any other
"sufficiently larger" delay), adding a posting read, or ditching the
delay completely and using cpu_relax. We went with the cpu_relax and
"915: Workaround hang with BSD and forcewake on SandyBridge". Which
blew up in fdo bug #52424, but adding the posting read while still
using cpu_relax seems to also fix that, it looks like the
posting read is the important ingriedient to fix these rc6 related
hangs on snb.
Popular theories as to why this is like it is include:
- A herd of pink elephants got royally angered somehow.
- The gpu has internally different functional units and judging by the
register offsets, the forcewake request register and the forcewake
ack registers are _not_ in the same functional unit (or at least
aren't reached through the same routes). Hence the posting read
syncs up with the wrong block and gets the entire gpu confused.
- ...
As a minimal ducttape fix for 3.6, let's just put these posting reads
into place again. We can try fancier approaches (like adding back the
cpu_relax instead of the udelay) in -next.
This (re-)fixes a regression introduced in
commit 990bbdadabaa51828e475eda86ee5720a4910cc3
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Mon Jul 2 11:51:02 2012 -0300
drm/i915: Group the GT routines together in both code and vtable
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: Du Yan <yanx.du@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52424
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51738u
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c index 94aabcaa3a6..58c07cdafb7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -3963,6 +3963,7 @@ static void __gen6_gt_force_wake_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) DRM_ERROR("Force wake wait timed out\n"); I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(FORCEWAKE, 1); + POSTING_READ(FORCEWAKE); if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ_NOTRACE(forcewake_ack) & 1), 500)) DRM_ERROR("Force wake wait timed out\n"); @@ -3983,6 +3984,7 @@ static void __gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_get(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) DRM_ERROR("Force wake wait timed out\n"); I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(FORCEWAKE_MT, _MASKED_BIT_ENABLE(1)); + POSTING_READ(FORCEWAKE_MT); if (wait_for_atomic_us((I915_READ_NOTRACE(forcewake_ack) & 1), 500)) DRM_ERROR("Force wake wait timed out\n"); @@ -4018,14 +4020,14 @@ void gen6_gt_check_fifodbg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) static void __gen6_gt_force_wake_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(FORCEWAKE, 0); - /* The below doubles as a POSTING_READ */ + POSTING_READ(FORCEWAKE); gen6_gt_check_fifodbg(dev_priv); } static void __gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { I915_WRITE_NOTRACE(FORCEWAKE_MT, _MASKED_BIT_DISABLE(1)); - /* The below doubles as a POSTING_READ */ + POSTING_READ(FORCEWAKE_MT); gen6_gt_check_fifodbg(dev_priv); } |