aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>2012-01-28 11:07:09 +0100
committerDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>2012-02-03 09:34:03 +0000
commit1849ecb22fb3b5d57b65e7369a3957adf9f26f39 (patch)
treea325a93dabc97cfa2bc1fe192a69150e5a845c89 /drivers
parent6d75e83ee31c146c8a3d56c762d3e15c483dc40e (diff)
drm/kms: Make i2c buses faster
A udelay value of 20 leads to an I2C bus running at only 25 kbps. I2C devices can typically operate faster than this, 50 kbps should be fine for all devices (and compliant devices can always stretch the clock if needed.) FWIW, the vast majority of framebuffer drivers set udelay to 10 already. So set it to 10 in DRM drivers too, this will make EDID block reads faster. We might even lower the udelay value later if no problem is reported. Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> Acked-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com> Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c2
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c2
2 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
index d30ccccb9d7..7fa4f640e6f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_i2c.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
/* Intel GPIO access functions */
-#define I2C_RISEFALL_TIME 20
+#define I2C_RISEFALL_TIME 10
static inline struct intel_gmbus *
to_intel_gmbus(struct i2c_adapter *i2c)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c
index 98a8ad68010..b7ec89bf393 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_i2c.c
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ struct radeon_i2c_chan *radeon_i2c_create(struct drm_device *dev,
i2c->algo.bit.setscl = set_clock;
i2c->algo.bit.getsda = get_data;
i2c->algo.bit.getscl = get_clock;
- i2c->algo.bit.udelay = 20;
+ i2c->algo.bit.udelay = 10;
/* vesa says 2.2 ms is enough, 1 jiffy doesn't seem to always
* make this, 2 jiffies is a lot more reliable */
i2c->algo.bit.timeout = 2;