aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>2013-02-13 11:09:14 -0500
committerJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>2013-02-20 12:59:57 -0500
commit569e0f358c0c37f6733702d4a5d2c412860f7169 (patch)
tree8ab0ece9bd2716da66a43406628f6f5176604817 /fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
parentdde5740fdd6175fc95aecf4ccc7856fbbad9b44e (diff)
Btrfs: place ordered operations on a per transaction list
Miao made the ordered operations stuff run async, which introduced a deadlock where we could get somebody (sync) racing in and committing the transaction while a commit was already happening. The new committer would try and flush ordered operations which would hang waiting for the commit to finish because it is done asynchronously and no longer inherits the callers trans handle. To fix this we need to make the ordered operations list a per transaction list. We can get new inodes added to the ordered operation list by truncating them and then having another process writing to them, so this makes it so that anybody trying to add an ordered operation _must_ start a transaction in order to add itself to the list, which will keep new inodes from getting added to the ordered operations list after we start committing. This should fix the deadlock and also keeps us from doing a lot more work than we need to during commit. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c13
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
index 9489fa96e3e..dc08d77b717 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
@@ -612,10 +612,12 @@ void btrfs_wait_ordered_extents(struct btrfs_root *root, int delay_iput)
* extra check to make sure the ordered operation list really is empty
* before we return
*/
-int btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_root *root, int wait)
+int btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
+ struct btrfs_root *root, int wait)
{
struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode;
struct inode *inode;
+ struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans = trans->transaction;
struct list_head splice;
struct list_head works;
struct btrfs_delalloc_work *work, *next;
@@ -626,7 +628,7 @@ int btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_root *root, int wait)
mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->ordered_operations_mutex);
spin_lock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
- list_splice_init(&root->fs_info->ordered_operations, &splice);
+ list_splice_init(&cur_trans->ordered_operations, &splice);
while (!list_empty(&splice)) {
btrfs_inode = list_entry(splice.next, struct btrfs_inode,
ordered_operations);
@@ -643,7 +645,7 @@ int btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_root *root, int wait)
if (!wait)
list_add_tail(&BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_operations,
- &root->fs_info->ordered_operations);
+ &cur_trans->ordered_operations);
spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
work = btrfs_alloc_delalloc_work(inode, wait, 1);
@@ -653,7 +655,7 @@ int btrfs_run_ordered_operations(struct btrfs_root *root, int wait)
list_add_tail(&btrfs_inode->ordered_operations,
&splice);
list_splice_tail(&splice,
- &root->fs_info->ordered_operations);
+ &cur_trans->ordered_operations);
spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
@@ -1033,6 +1035,7 @@ out:
void btrfs_add_ordered_operation(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode)
{
+ struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans = trans->transaction;
u64 last_mod;
last_mod = max(BTRFS_I(inode)->generation, BTRFS_I(inode)->last_trans);
@@ -1047,7 +1050,7 @@ void btrfs_add_ordered_operation(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
spin_lock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
if (list_empty(&BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_operations)) {
list_add_tail(&BTRFS_I(inode)->ordered_operations,
- &root->fs_info->ordered_operations);
+ &cur_trans->ordered_operations);
}
spin_unlock(&root->fs_info->ordered_extent_lock);
}