1 files changed, 125 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6b800a14b99..6831abb5dbe 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/profile.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/mempolicy.h>
+#include <linux/task_work.h>
 
 #include <trace/events/sched.h>
 
@@ -776,6 +778,126 @@ update_stats_curr_start(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
  * Scheduling class queueing methods:
  */
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
+/*
+ * numa task sample period in ms: 5s
+ */
+unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_min = 5000;
+unsigned int sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_max = 5000*16;
+
+static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	int seq = ACCESS_ONCE(p->mm->numa_scan_seq);
+
+	if (p->numa_scan_seq == seq)
+		return;
+	p->numa_scan_seq = seq;
+
+	/* FIXME: Scheduling placement policy hints go here */
+}
+
+/*
+ * Got a PROT_NONE fault for a page on @node.
+ */
+void task_numa_fault(int node, int pages)
+{
+	struct task_struct *p = current;
+
+	/* FIXME: Allocate task-specific structure for placement policy here */
+
+	task_numa_placement(p);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The expensive part of numa migration is done from task_work context.
+ * Triggered from task_tick_numa().
+ */
+void task_numa_work(struct callback_head *work)
+{
+	unsigned long migrate, next_scan, now = jiffies;
+	struct task_struct *p = current;
+	struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
+
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(p != container_of(work, struct task_struct, numa_work));
+
+	work->next = work; /* protect against double add */
+	/*
+	 * Who cares about NUMA placement when they're dying.
+	 *
+	 * NOTE: make sure not to dereference p->mm before this check,
+	 * exit_task_work() happens _after_ exit_mm() so we could be called
+	 * without p->mm even though we still had it when we enqueued this
+	 * work.
+	 */
+	if (p->flags & PF_EXITING)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Enforce maximal scan/migration frequency..
+	 */
+	migrate = mm->numa_next_scan;
+	if (time_before(now, migrate))
+		return;
+
+	if (p->numa_scan_period == 0)
+		p->numa_scan_period = sysctl_numa_balancing_scan_period_min;
+
+	next_scan = now + 2*msecs_to_jiffies(p->numa_scan_period);
+	if (cmpxchg(&mm->numa_next_scan, migrate, next_scan) != migrate)
+		return;
+
+	ACCESS_ONCE(mm->numa_scan_seq)++;
+	{
+		struct vm_area_struct *vma;
+
+		down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+		for (vma = mm->mmap; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
+			if (!vma_migratable(vma))
+				continue;
+			change_prot_numa(vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end);
+		}
+		up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * Drive the periodic memory faults..
+ */
+void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
+{
+	struct callback_head *work = &curr->numa_work;
+	u64 period, now;
+
+	/*
+	 * We don't care about NUMA placement if we don't have memory.
+	 */
+	if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING) || work->next != work)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Using runtime rather than walltime has the dual advantage that
+	 * we (mostly) drive the selection from busy threads and that the
+	 * task needs to have done some actual work before we bother with
+	 * NUMA placement.
+	 */
+	now = curr->se.sum_exec_runtime;
+	period = (u64)curr->numa_scan_period * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
+
+	if (now - curr->node_stamp > period) {
+		curr->node_stamp = now;
+
+		if (!time_before(jiffies, curr->mm->numa_next_scan)) {
+			init_task_work(work, task_numa_work); /* TODO: move this into sched_fork() */
+			task_work_add(curr, work, true);
+		}
+	}
+}
+#else
+static void task_tick_numa(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
+{
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
+
 static void
 account_entity_enqueue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
 {
@@ -4954,6 +5076,9 @@ static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued)
 		cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
 		entity_tick(cfs_rq, se, queued);
 	}
+
+	if (sched_feat_numa(NUMA))
+		task_tick_numa(rq, curr);
 }
 
 /*