aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/acpi/scan.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2012-11-23ACPI: add SDHCI to ACPI platform devicesAdrian Hunter
Add the generic ACPI SDHCI device ID to acpi_platform_device_ids[] to make the ACPI core create a platform device object for the ACPI device node of that ID. [rjw: Added the changelog.] Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-21ACPI / PM: Introduce os_accessible flag for power_stateAaron Lu
Currently we have valid flag to represent if this ACPI device power state is valid. A device power state is valid does not necessarily mean we, as OSPM, has a mean to put the device into that power state, e.g. D3 cold is always a valid power state for any ACPI device, but if there is no _PS3 or _PRx for this device, we can't really put that device into D3 cold power state. The same is true for D0 power state. So here comes the os_accessible flag, which is only set if the device has provided us the required means to put it into that power state, e.g. if we have _PS3 or _PRx, we can put the device into D3 cold state and thus, D3 cold power state's os_accessible flag will be set in this case. And a new wrapper inline function is added to be used to check if firmware has provided us a way to power off the device during runtime. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-21ACPI / driver core: Introduce struct acpi_dev_node and related macrosRafael J. Wysocki
To avoid adding an ACPI handle pointer to struct device on architectures that don't use ACPI, or generally when CONFIG_ACPI is not set, in which cases that pointer is useless, define struct acpi_dev_node that will contain the handle pointer if CONFIG_ACPI is set and will be empty otherwise and use it to represent the ACPI device node field in struct device. In addition to that define macros for reading and setting the ACPI handle of a device that don't generate code when CONFIG_ACPI is unset. Modify the ACPI subsystem to use those macros instead of referring to the given device's ACPI handle directly. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2012-11-16ACPI: create _SUN sysfs fileYasuaki Ishimatsu
_SUN method provides the slot unique-ID in the ACPI namespace. And The value is written in Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification as follows: "The _SUN value is required to be unique among the slots ofthe same type. It is also recommended that this number match the slot number printed on the physical slot whenever possible." So if we can know the value, we can identify the physical position of the slot in the system. The patch creates "sun" file in sysfs for identifying physical position of the slot. Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPICA: Fix divergences of definition conflicts.Lv Zheng
There are conflicts in the "acpi_device_id*" definitions between the Linux and the ACPICA. The definitions of acpi_device_id* in ACPICA have been changed to the "acpi_pnp_device_id*". This patch changes the corresponding "acpica_device_id*" definitiions in the Linux. This patch will not affect the generated vmlinx binary. This will decrease 298 lines of 20120913 divergence.diff. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: Add support for platform bus typeMika Westerberg
With ACPI 5 it is now possible to enumerate traditional SoC peripherals, like serial bus controllers and slave devices behind them. These devices are typically based on IP-blocks used in many existing SoC platforms and platform drivers for them may already be present in the kernel tree. To make driver "porting" more straightforward, add ACPI support to the platform bus type. Instead of writing ACPI "glue" drivers for the existing platform drivers, register the platform bus type with ACPI to create platform device objects for the drivers and bind the corresponding ACPI handles to those platform devices. This should allow us to reuse the existing platform drivers for the devices in question with the minimum amount of modifications. This changeset is based on Mika Westerberg's and Mathias Nyman's work. Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: Provide generic functions for matching ACPI device nodesMika Westerberg
Introduce function acpi_match_device() allowing callers to match struct device objects with populated acpi_handle fields against arrays of ACPI device IDs. Also introduce function acpi_driver_match_device() using acpi_match_device() internally and allowing callers to match a struct device object against an array of ACPI device IDs provided by a device driver. Additionally, introduce macro ACPI_PTR() that may be used by device drivers to escape pointers to data structures whose definitions depend on CONFIG_ACPI. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: Export functions for hot-removeToshi Kani
Exported acpi_os_hotplug_execute() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() so that they can be called from modules for hot-remove operations. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: Add user space interface for identification objectsLv Zheng
ACPI devices are glued with physical devices through _ADR object, ACPI enumerated devices are identified with _UID object. Currently we can observe _HID/_CID through sysfs interfaces (hid/modalias), but there's no way for us to check _ADR/_UID from user space. This patch closes this gap for ACPI developers and users. [rjw: Modified the subject and changelog slightly.] Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: Add _UID support for ACPI devices.Lv Zheng
The _UID object is optional, but is required when the device has no other way to report a persistent unique device ID. This patch is required for ACPI 5.0 ACPI enumerated IP cores. Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: Remove unused lockable in acpi_device_flagsToshi Kani
Removed lockable in struct acpi_device_flags since it is no longer used by any code. acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() cannot use this flag because acpi_bus_trim() frees up its acpi_device object. Furthermore, the dock driver calls _LCK method without using this lockable flag. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-11-15ACPI: Fix stale pointer access to flags.lockableToshi Kani
During hot-remove, acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() calls ACPI _LCK method when device->flags.lockable is set. However, this device pointer is stale since the target acpi_device object has been already kfree'd by acpi_bus_trim(). The flags.lockable indicates whether or not this ACPI object implements _LCK method. Fix the stable pointer access by replacing it with acpi_get_handle() to check if _LCK is implemented. Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2012-10-06Merge branches 'acpica', 'acpidump', 'intel-idle', 'misc', ↵Len Brown
'module_acpi_driver-simplify', 'turbostat' and 'usb3' into release add acpidump utility intel_idle driver now supports IVB Xeon turbostat can now count SMIs ACPI can now bind to USB3 hubs misc fixes
2012-10-06ACPI: Add new sysfs interface to export device descriptionLance Ortiz
Add support to export the device description obtained from the ACPI _STR method, if one exists for a device, to user-space via a sysfs interface. This new interface provides a standard and platform neutral way for users to obtain the description text stored in the ACPI _STR method. If no _STR method exists for the device, no sysfs 'description' file will be created. The 'description' file will be located in the /sys/devices/ directory using the device's path. /sys/device/<bus>/<bridge path>/<device path>.../firmware_node/description Example: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00.07.0/0000:0e:00.0/firmware_node/description It can also be located using the ACPI device path, for example: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/ACPI0004:00/PNP0A08:00/device:13/device:15/description /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/ACPI0004:00/ACPI0004:01/ACPI0007:02/description Execute the 'cat' command on the 'description' file to obtain the description string for that device. This patch also includes documentation describing how the new sysfs interface works Changes from v1-v2 based on comments by Len Brown and Fengguang Wu * Removed output "No Description" and leaving a NULL attribute if the _STR method failed to evaluate. * In acpi_device_remove_files() removed the redundent check of dev->pnp.str_obj before calling free. This check triggered a message from smatch. Signed-off-by: Lance Ortiz <lance.ortiz@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-09-21ACPI: Allow ACPI binding with USB-3.0 hubLan Tianyu
A USB port's position and connectability can't be identified on some boards via USB hub registers. ACPI _UPC and _PLD can help to resolve this issue and so it is necessary to bind USB with ACPI. This patch is to allow ACPI binding with USB-3.0 hub. Current ACPI only can bind one struct-device to one ACPI device node. This can not work with USB-3.0 hub, because the USB-3.0 hub has two logical devices. Each works for USB-2.0 and USB-3.0 devices. In the Linux USB subsystem, those two logical hubs are treated as two seperate devices that have two struct devices. But in the ACPI DSDT, these two logical hubs share one ACPI device node. So there is a requirement to bind multi struct-devices to one ACPI device node. This patch is to resolve such problem. Following is the ACPI device nodes' description under xhci hcd. Device (XHC) Device (RHUB) Device (HSP1) Device (HSP2) Device (HSP3) Device (HSP4) Device (SSP1) Device (SSP2) Device (SSP3) Device (SSP4) Topology in the Linux device XHC USB-2.0 logical hub USB-3.0 logical hub HSP1 SSP1 HSP2 SSP2 HSP3 SSP3 HSP4 SSP4 This patch also modifies the output of /proc/acpi/wakeup. One ACPI node can be associated with multiple devices: XHC S4 *enabled pci:0000:00:14.0 RHUB S0 disabled usb:usb1 disabled usb:usb2 Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Acked-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-07-26Merge branch 'release' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux Pull ACPI & power management update from Len Brown: "Re-write of the turbostat tool. lower overhead was necessary for measuring very large system when they are very idle. IVB support in intel_idle It's what I run on my IVB, others should be able to also:-) ACPICA core update We have found some bugs due to divergence between Linux and the upstream ACPICA base. Most of these patches are to reduce that divergence to reduce the risk of future bugs. Some cpuidle updates, mostly for non-Intel More will be coming, as they depend on this part. Some thermal management changes needed by non-ACPI systems. Some _OST (OS Status Indication) updates for hot ACPI hot-plug." * 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux: (51 commits) Thermal: Documentation update Thermal: Add Hysteresis attributes Thermal: Make Thermal trip points writeable ACPI/AC: prevent OOPS on some boxes due to missing check power_supply_register() return value check tools/power: turbostat: fix large c1% issue tools/power: turbostat v2 - re-write for efficiency ACPICA: Update to version 20120711 ACPICA: AcpiSrc: Fix some translation issues for Linux conversion ACPICA: Update header files copyrights to 2012 ACPICA: Add new ACPI table load/unload external interfaces ACPICA: Split file: tbxface.c -> tbxfload.c ACPICA: Add PCC address space to space ID decode function ACPICA: Fix some comment fields ACPICA: Table manager: deploy new firmware error/warning interfaces ACPICA: Add new interfaces for BIOS(firmware) errors and warnings ACPICA: Split exception code utilities to a new file, utexcep.c ACPI: acpi_pad: tune round_robin_time ACPICA: Update to version 20120620 ACPICA: Add support for implicit notify on multiple devices ACPICA: Update comments; no functional change ...
2012-07-26Merge branches 'acpi_pad', 'acpica', 'apei-bugzilla-43282', 'battery', ↵Len Brown
'cpuidle-coupled', 'cpuidle-tweaks', 'intel_idle-ivb', 'ost', 'red-hat-bz-772730', 'thermal', 'thermal-spear' and 'turbostat-v2' into release
2012-07-01ACPI / PM: Drop PM callbacks from the ACPI bus typeRafael J. Wysocki
Since the ACPI bus type's PM callbacks only execute the driver ones without doing anything else, they can be dropped, because the driver callbacks will be executed by the PM core directly if bus type (or other subsystem) callbacks are not present. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01ACPI / PM: Do not execute legacy driver PM callbacksRafael J. Wysocki
Since all ACPI drivers in the tree should have been switched to power management handling based on struct dev_pm_ops, modify the ACPI bus type driver so that is doesn't execute legacy driver power management callbacks from the functions pointed to by the members of the acpi_bus_pm structure. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01ACPI / PM: Make acpi_bus_type use driver struct dev_pm_ops callbacksRafael J. Wysocki
Modify acpi_bus_type so that it executes PM callbacks provided by drivers through their struct dev_pm_ops objects, if present, while still allowing the legacy ACPI PM callbacks to take precedence. This will make it possible to convert ACPI drivers one by one to handling PM through struct dev_pm_ops instead of the legacy way. The code added by this change is temporary and will be removed when all of the drivers in question have been switched over to the PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01ACPI / PM: Make acpi_bus_type use struct dev_pm_ops for PM handlingRafael J. Wysocki
Make the acpi_bus_type bus type define its PM callbacks through a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks in struct bus_type. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-07-01ACPI / PM: Drop pm_message_t argument from device suspend callbackRafael J. Wysocki
None of the drivers implementing the ACPI device suspend callback uses the pm_message_t argument of it, so this argument may be dropped entirely from that callback. This will simplify switching the ACPI bus type to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-06-04ACPI: Add _OST support for sysfs ejectToshi Kani
Changed acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() to support _OST. This function is also changed to global so that it can be called from hotplug notify handlers to perform hot-remove operation. Changed acpi_eject_store(), which is the sysfs eject handler. It checks eject_pending to see if the request was originated from ACPI eject notification. If not, it calls _OST(0x103,84,) per Figure 6-37 in ACPI 5.0 spec. Added eject_pending bit to acpi_device_flags. This bit is set when the kernel has received an ACPI eject notification, but does not initiate its hot-remove operation by itself. Added struct acpi_eject_event. This structure is used to pass extended information to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), which has a single argument to support asynchronous call Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-05-29ACPI / PM: Generate wakeup events on fixed power buttonDaniel Drake
When the system is woken up by the ACPI fixed power button, currently there is no way of userspace becoming aware that the power button was pressed. OLPC would like to know this, so that we can respond appropriately. For example, if the system was woken up by a network packet, we know we can go back to sleep very quickly. But if the user explicitly woke the system with the power button, we're going to want to stay awake for a while. The wakeup count mechanism seems like a good fit for communicating this. Mark the fixed power button as wakeup-enabled, and increment its wakeup counter when the system is woken with the power button. (The wakeup counter is also incremented when the power button is pressed during system operation; this is already handled by an existing acpi-button codepath). Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org> Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2012-05-17ACPI / PCI / PM: Fix device PM regression related to D3hot/D3coldRafael J. Wysocki
Commit 1cc0c998fdf2 ("ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion") introduced a bug in __acpi_bus_set_power() and changed the behavior of acpi_pci_set_power_state() in such a way that it generally doesn't work as expected if PCI_D3hot is passed to it as the second argument. First off, if ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) is passed to __acpi_bus_set_power() and the explicit_set flag is set for the D3cold state, the function will try to execute AML method called "_PS4", which doesn't exist. Fix this by adding a check to ensure that the name of the AML method to execute for transitions to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD is correct in __acpi_bus_set_power(). Also make sure that the explicit_set flag for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD will be set if _PS3 is present and modify acpi_power_transition() to avoid accessing power resources for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, because they don't exist. Second, if PCI_D3hot is passed to acpi_pci_set_power_state() as the target state, the function will request a transition to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT instead of ACPI_STATE_D3. However, ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT is now only marked as supported if the _PR3 AML method is defined for the given device, which is rare. This causes problems to happen on systems where devices were successfully put into ACPI D3 by pci_set_power_state(PCI_D3hot) which doesn't work now. In particular, some unused graphics adapters are not turned off as a result. To fix this issue restore the old behavior of acpi_pci_set_power_state(), which is to request a transition to ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) if either PCI_D3hot or PCI_D3cold is passed to it as the argument. This approach is not ideal, because generally power should not be removed from devices if PCI_D3hot is the target power state, but since this behavior is relied on, we have no choice but to restore it at the moment and spend more time on designing a better solution in the future. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43228 Reported-by: rocko <rockorequin@hotmail.com> Reported-by: Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org> Reported-and-tested-by: Peter <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-05-05ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusionLin Ming
Before this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 incorrectly referenced D3hot in some places, but D3cold in other places. After this patch, ACPI_STATE_D3 always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD; and all references to D3hot use ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT. ACPI's _PR3 method is used to enter both D3hot and D3cold states. What distinguishes D3hot from D3cold is the presence _PR3 (Power Resources for D3hot) If these resources are all ON, then the state is D3hot. If _PR3 is not present, or all _PR0 resources for the devices are OFF, then the state is D3cold. This patch applies after Linux-3.4-rc1. A future syntax cleanup may remove ACPI_STATE_D3 to emphasize that it always means ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-03-30Merge branch 'd3' into releaseLen Brown
Conflicts: drivers/acpi/sleep.c This was a text conflict between a2ef5c4fd44ce3922435139393b89f2cce47f576 (ACPI: Move module parameter gts and bfs to sleep.c) which added #include <linux/module.h> and b24e5098853653554baf6ec975b9e855f3d6e5c0 (ACPI, PCI: Move acpi_dev_run_wake() to ACPI core) which added #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> The resolution was to take them both. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-03-30ACPI: Clean redundant codes in scan.cAlex He
Clean the redundant codes of apci_bus_get_power_flags(). Signed-off-by: Alex He <alex.he@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2012-03-30ACPI: Introduce ACPI D3_COLD state supportZhang Rui
If a device has _PR3, it means the device supports D3_COLD. Add the ability to validate and enter D3_COLD state in ACPI. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-11-06ACPI: use kstrdup()Thomas Meyer
Use kstrdup rather than duplicating its implementation The semantic patch that makes this output is available in scripts/coccinelle/api/kstrdup.cocci. More information about semantic patching is available at http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/ Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-04-26ACPI / PM: Avoid infinite recurrence while registering power resourcesRafael J. Wysocki
There is at least one BIOS with a DSDT containing a power resource object with a _PR0 entry pointing back to that power resource. In consequence, while registering that power resource acpi_bus_get_power_flags() sees that it depends on itself and tries to register it again, which leads to an infinitely deep recurrence. This problem was introduced by commit bf325f9538d8c89312be305b9779e (ACPI / PM: Register power resource devices as soon as they are needed). To fix this problem use the observation that power resources cannot be power manageable and prevent acpi_bus_get_power_flags() from being called for power resource objects. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31872 Reported-and-tested-by: Pascal Dormeau <pdormeau@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: stable@kernel.org
2011-02-24ACPI: Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count device fieldRafael J. Wysocki
The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for generating wakeup signals more than once in a row. However, it really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different threads for the same device. Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
2011-01-12ACPI: Drop device flag wake_capableRafael J. Wysocki
The wake_capable ACPI device flag is not necessary, because it is only used in scan.c for recording the information that _PRW is present for the given device. That information is only used by acpi_add_single_object() to decide whether or not to call acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(), so the flag may be dropped if the _PRW check is moved to acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags(). Moreover, acpi_bus_get_wakeup_device_flags() always returns 0, so it really should be void. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-12ACPI: Always check if _PRW is present before trying to evaluate itRafael J. Wysocki
Before evaluating _PRW for devices that are reported as inactive or not present by their _STA control methods we should check if those methods are actually present (otherwise the evaulation of _PRW will obviously fail and a scary message will be printed unnecessarily). Reported-by: Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Reported-by: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-12Merge branch 'wakeup-etc-rafael' into releaseLen Brown
2011-01-12Merge branch 'power-resource' into releaseLen Brown
2011-01-12ACPI / PM: Register power resource devices as soon as they are neededRafael J. Wysocki
Depending on the organization of the ACPI namespace, power resource device objects may generally be scanned after the "regular" device objects that they are referred from through _PRn. This, in turn, may cause acpi_bus_get_power_flags() to attempt to access them through acpi_bus_init_power() before they are registered (and initialized by acpi_power_driver). [This is not a theoretical issue, it actually happens for one PnP device on my testbed HP nx6325.] To fix this problem, make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() attempt to register power resource devices as soon as they have been found in the _PRn output for any other devices. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-12ACPI / PM: Register acpi_power_driver earlyRafael J. Wysocki
The ACPI device driver used for handling power resources, acpi_power_driver, creates a struct acpi_power_resource object for each ACPI device representing a power resource. These objects are then used when setting and reading the power states of devices using the corresponding power resources. Unfortunately, acpi_power_driver is registered after acpi_scan_init() that may add devices using the power resources before acpi_power_driver has a chance to create struct acpi_power_resource objects for them (specifically, the power resources may be referred to during the scanning process through acpi_bus_get_power() before they have been initialized). As the first step towards fixing this issue, move the registration of acpi_power_driver into acpi_scan_init() so that power resource devices can be initialized by it as soon as they have been found in the namespace. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-12ACPI / PM: Add function for device power state initializationRafael J. Wysocki
Add function acpi_bus_init_power() for getting the initial power state of an ACPI device and reference counting its power resources as appropriate. Make acpi_bus_get_power_flags() use the new function instead of acpi_bus_get_power() that updates device->power.state without reference counting the device's power resources. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-12ACPICA: Implicit notify supportLin Ming
This feature provides an automatic device notification for wake devices when a wakeup GPE occurs and there is no corresponding GPE method or handler. Rather than ignoring such a GPE, an implicit AML Notify operation is performed on the parent device object. This feature is not part of the ACPI specification and is provided for Windows compatibility only. Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-12ACPICA: Rename some function and variable namesLin Ming
Some function and variable names are renamed to be consistent with ACPICA code base. acpi_raw_enable_gpe -> acpi_ev_add_gpe_reference acpi_raw_disable_gpe -> acpi_ev_remove_gpe_reference acpi_gpe_can_wake -> acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake acpi_gpe_wakeup -> acpi_set_gpe_wake_mask acpi_update_gpes -> acpi_update_all_gpes acpi_all_gpes_initialized -> acpi_gbl_all_gpes_initialized acpi_handler_info -> acpi_gpe_handler_info ... Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-01-07ACPI / PM: Use device wakeup flags for handling ACPI wakeup devicesRafael J. Wysocki
There are ACPI devices (buttons and the laptop lid) that can wake up the system from sleep states and have no "physical" companion devices. The ACPI subsystem uses two flags, wakeup.state.enabled and wakeup.flags.always_enabled, for handling those devices, but they are not accessible through the standard device wakeup infrastructure. User space can only control them via the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface that is not really convenient (e.g. the way in which devices are enabled to wake up the system is not portable between different systems, because it requires one to know the devices' "names" used in the system's ACPI tables). To address this problem, use standard device wakeup flags instead of the special ACPI flags for handling those devices. In particular, use device_set_wakeup_capable() to mark the ACPI wakeup devices during initialization and use device_set_wakeup_enable() to allow or disallow them to wake up the system from sleep states. Rework the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface to take these changes into account. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-12-17ACPI: Execute _PRW for devices reported as inactive or not presentRafael J. Wysocki
If a device is reported as inactive or not present by its _STA control method, acpi_bus_check_add() skips it without evaluating its _PRW method. This leads to a problem when the device's _PRW method points to a GPE, because in that case the GPE may be enabled by ACPICA during the subsequent acpi_update_gpes() call which, in turn, may cause a GPE storm to appear. To avoid this issue, make acpi_bus_check_add() evaluate _PRW for inactive or not present devices and register the wakeup GPE information returned by them, so that acpi_update_gpes() does not enable their GPEs unnecessarily. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reported-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-10-25Merge branch 'gpe-defer' into releaseLen Brown
2010-10-01ACPI/PNP: A HID value of an object never changes -> make it constThomas Renninger
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-10-01ACPI: Do not export hid/modalias sysfs file for ACPI objects without a HIDThomas Renninger
Boot and compile tested. The fact that pnp.ids can now be empty needs testing on some further machines, though. This should handle a "modprobe is wrongly called by udev" issue: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19162 Modaliase files in /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/ went down from 113 to 71 on my tested system. This is a sysfs change, but userspace must already be able to handle it. Also do not fill up pnp.ids list with a "struct hid" entry. This comment: * This generic ID isn't useful for driver binding, but it provides * the useful property that "every acpi_device has an ID." is still half way true: Best you never touch pnp.ids list directly or make sure it can be empty, instead use: char *acpi_device_hid() which always returns a value ("device" as a dummy if the object has no hid). Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> CC: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> CC: kay.sievers@vrfy.org CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-09-24ACPI / ACPICA: Defer enabling of runtime GPEs (v3)Rafael J. Wysocki
The current ACPI GPEs initialization code has a problem that it enables some GPEs pointed to by device _PRW methods, generally intended for signaling wakeup events (system or device wakeup). These GPEs are then almost immediately disabled by the ACPI namespace scanning code with the help of acpi_gpe_can_wake(), but it would be better not to enable them at all until really necessary. Modify the initialization of GPEs so that the ones that have associated _Lxx or _Exx methods and are not pointed to by any _PRW methods will be enabled after the namespace scan is complete. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-07-12ACPI / ACPICA: Do not execute _PRW methods during initializationRafael J. Wysocki
Currently, during initialization ACPICA walks the entire ACPI namespace in search of any device objects with assciated _PRW methods. All of the _PRW methods found are executed in the process to extract the GPE information returned by them, so that the GPEs in question can be marked as "able to wakeup" (more precisely, the ACPI_GPE_CAN_WAKE flag is set for them). The only purpose of this exercise is to avoid enabling the CAN_WAKE GPEs automatically, even if there are _Lxx/_Exx methods associated with them. However, it is both costly and unnecessary, because the host OS has to execute the _PRW methods anyway to check which devices can wake up the system from sleep states. Moreover, it then uses full information returned by _PRW, including the GPE information, so it can take care of disabling the GPEs if necessary. Remove the code that walks the namespace and executes _PRW from ACPICA and modify comments to reflect that change. Make acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags() disable GPEs for wakeup devices so that they don't cause spurious wakeup events to be signaled. This not only reduces the complexity of the ACPICA initialization code, but in some cases it should reduce the kernel boot time as well. Unfortunately, for this purpose we need a new ACPICA function, acpi_gpe_can_wake(), to be called by the host OS in order to disable the GPEs that can wake up the system and were previously enabled by acpi_ev_initialize_gpe_block() or acpi_ev_update_gpes() (such a GPE should be disabled only once, because the initialization code enables it only once, but it may be pointed to by _PRW for multiple devices and that's why the additional function is necessary). Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-07-12ACPI: Fix bogus GPE test in acpi_bus_set_run_wake_flags()Rafael J. Wysocki
When we check if a GPE can be used for runtime signaling, we only search the FADT GPE blocks, which is incorrect, becuase the GPE may be located elsewhere. We really should be using the GPE device information previously returned by _PRW here, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-04-20ACPICA: Minimize the differences between linux GPE code and ACPICA code baseLin Ming
We have ported Rafael's major GPE changes (ACPI: Use GPE reference counting to support shared GPEs) into ACPICA code base. But the port and Rafael's original patch have some differences, so we made below patch to make linux GPE code consistent with ACPICA code base. Most changes are about comments and coding styles. Other noticeable changes are based on: Rafael: Reduce code duplication related to GPE lookup https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/86237/ Rafael: Always use the same lock for GPE locking https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90471/ A new field gpe_count in struct acpi_gpe_block_info to record the number of individual GPEs in block. Rename acpi_ev_save_method_info to acpi_ev_match_gpe_method. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>