| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Recent changes to sleep initialization in ACPI dropped reporting of supported Sx
states above S3. Fix that and also move S5 init into same file as other Sx.
The only functional change is adding printk() for S4 and S5 cases.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Restore the 2.6.22 CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP build option, but now shadowing the
new CONFIG_PM_SLEEP option.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
[ Modified to work with the PM config setup changes. ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
As it was a synonym for (CONFIG_ACPI && CONFIG_X86),
the ifdefs for it were more clutter than they were worth.
For ia64, just add a few stubs in anticipation of future
S3 or S4 support.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Introduce the pm_power_off_prepare() callback that can be registered by the
interested platforms in analogy with pm_idle() and pm_power_off(), used for
preparing the system to power off (needed by ACPI).
This allows us to drop acpi_sysclass and device_acpi that are only defined in
order to register the ACPI power off preparation callback, which is needed by
pm_power_off() registered in a much different way.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Since we are now explicitly calling hibernation_ops->prepare() before
hibernation_ops->enter() in hibernation_platform_enter() (defined in
kernel/power/disk.c), ACPI should not call acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S4)
from acpi_shutdown().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
After Al Viro (finally) succeeded in removing the sched.h #include in module.h
recently, it makes sense again to remove other superfluous sched.h includes.
There are quite a lot of files which include it but don't actually need
anything defined in there. Presumably these includes were once needed for
macros that used to live in sched.h, but moved to other header files in the
course of cleaning it up.
To ease the pain, this time I did not fiddle with any header files and only
removed #includes from .c-files, which tend to cause less trouble.
Compile tested against 2.6.20-rc2 and 2.6.20-rc2-mm2 (with offsets) on alpha,
arm, i386, ia64, mips, powerpc, and x86_64 with allnoconfig, defconfig,
allmodconfig, and allyesconfig as well as a few randconfigs on x86_64 and all
configs in arch/arm/configs on arm. I also checked that no new warnings were
introduced by the patch (actually, some warnings are removed that were emitted
by unnecessarily included header files).
Signed-off-by: Tim Schmielau <tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de>
Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4320
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Remove S4BIOS support. It is pretty useless, and only ever worked for _me_
once. (I do not think anyone else ever tried it). It was in feature-removal
for a long time, and it should have been removed before.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
|
|
When acpi_sleep_prepare was moved into a shutdown method we
started calling it for all shutdowns.
It appears this triggers some systems to power off on reboot.
Avoid this by only calling acpi_sleep_prepare if we are going to power
off the system.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Now that all of the code paths that call acpi_power_off
have been modified to call either call kernel_power_off
(which calls apci_sleep_prepare by way of acpi_shutdown)
or to call acpi_sleep_prepare directly it is redundant to call
acpi_sleep_prepare from acpi_power_off.
So simplify the code and simply don't call acpi_sleep_prepare.
In addition there is a little error handling done so if we
can't register the acpi class we don't hook pm_power_off.
I think I have done the right thing with the CONFIG_PM define
but I'm not certain. Can this code even be compiled if
CONFIG_PM is false?
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
machine_power_off on i386 and x86_64 now switch to the
boot cpu out of paranoia and because the MP Specification indicates it
is a good idea on reboot, so for those architectures it is a noop.
I can't see anything in the acpi spec that requires you to be on
the boot cpu to power off the system, so this should not be an issue
for ia64. In addition ia64 has the altix a massive multi-node
system where switching to the boot cpu sounds insane as we may
hot removed the boot cpu.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
|
Register an "acpi" system device to be notified of shutdown preparation.
This depends on CONFIG_PM
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
