From fbab1c809467efe001194ab8bb17f0f451a17f97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Russell King Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:57:50 +0100 Subject: ARM: entry: no need to check parent IRQ mask in IRQ handler return There's no point checking to see whether IRQs were masked in the parent context when returning from IRQ handling - the fact that we're handling an IRQ means that the parent context must have had IRQs unmasked. Signed-off-by: Russell King --- arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S') diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S index 1e5f387c70a..fd42e667a81 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S @@ -234,8 +234,9 @@ __irq_svc: #endif ldr r4, [sp, #S_PSR] @ irqs are already disabled #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS - tst r4, #PSR_I_BIT - bleq trace_hardirqs_on + @ The parent context IRQs must have been enabled to get here in + @ the first place, so there's no point checking the PSR I bit. + bl trace_hardirqs_on #endif svc_exit r4 @ return from exception UNWIND(.fnend ) -- cgit v1.2.3