From d4a3b10c16a1bdb09483233bd7aeac684ccc160a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Williamson Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 18:49:33 -0600 Subject: vga_switcheroo: Remove unbalanced pci_enable_device This is unbalanced and probably more fitting for the client to take care of. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/vga') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c b/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c index e01cacba685..f0f244d2943 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c @@ -215,7 +215,6 @@ static int vga_switchoff(struct vga_switcheroo_client *client) /* stage one happens before delay */ static int vga_switchto_stage1(struct vga_switcheroo_client *new_client) { - int ret; int i; struct vga_switcheroo_client *active = NULL; @@ -231,11 +230,6 @@ static int vga_switchto_stage1(struct vga_switcheroo_client *new_client) if (!active) return 0; - /* power up the first device */ - ret = pci_enable_device(new_client->pdev); - if (ret) - return ret; - if (new_client->pwr_state == VGA_SWITCHEROO_OFF) vga_switchon(new_client); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 3448a19da479b6bd1e28e2a2be9fa16c6a6feb39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Airlie Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 15:32:24 +1000 Subject: vgaarb: use bridges to control VGA routing where possible. So in a lot of modern systems, a GPU will always be below a parent bridge that won't share with any other GPUs. This means VGA arbitration on those GPUs can be controlled by using the bridge routing instead of io/mem decodes. The problem is locating which GPUs share which upstream bridges. This patch attempts to identify all the GPUs which can be controlled via bridges, and ones that can't. This patch endeavours to work out the bridge sharing semantics. When disabling GPUs via a bridge, it doesn't do irq callbacks or touch the io/mem decodes for the gpu. Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie --- drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/gpu/vga') diff --git a/drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c b/drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c index be8d4cb5861..8a1021f2e31 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ struct vga_device { unsigned int mem_lock_cnt; /* legacy MEM lock count */ unsigned int io_norm_cnt; /* normal IO count */ unsigned int mem_norm_cnt; /* normal MEM count */ - + bool bridge_has_one_vga; /* allow IRQ enable/disable hook */ void *cookie; void (*irq_set_state)(void *cookie, bool enable); @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ static struct vga_device *__vga_tryget(struct vga_device *vgadev, unsigned int wants, legacy_wants, match; struct vga_device *conflict; unsigned int pci_bits; + u32 flags = 0; + /* Account for "normal" resources to lock. If we decode the legacy, * counterpart, we need to request it as well */ @@ -237,16 +239,23 @@ static struct vga_device *__vga_tryget(struct vga_device *vgadev, /* looks like he doesn't have a lock, we can steal * them from him */ - vga_irq_set_state(conflict, false); + flags = 0; pci_bits = 0; - if (lwants & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MEM|VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_MEM)) - pci_bits |= PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY; - if (lwants & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_IO|VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_IO)) - pci_bits |= PCI_COMMAND_IO; - pci_set_vga_state(conflict->pdev, false, pci_bits, - change_bridge); + if (!conflict->bridge_has_one_vga) { + vga_irq_set_state(conflict, false); + flags |= PCI_VGA_STATE_CHANGE_DECODES; + if (lwants & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MEM|VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_MEM)) + pci_bits |= PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY; + if (lwants & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_IO|VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_IO)) + pci_bits |= PCI_COMMAND_IO; + } + + if (change_bridge) + flags |= PCI_VGA_STATE_CHANGE_BRIDGE; + + pci_set_vga_state(conflict->pdev, false, pci_bits, flags); conflict->owns &= ~lwants; /* If he also owned non-legacy, that is no longer the case */ if (lwants & VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MEM) @@ -261,14 +270,24 @@ enable_them: * also have in "decodes". We can lock resources we don't decode but * not own them. */ + flags = 0; pci_bits = 0; - if (wants & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MEM|VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_MEM)) - pci_bits |= PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY; - if (wants & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_IO|VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_IO)) - pci_bits |= PCI_COMMAND_IO; - pci_set_vga_state(vgadev->pdev, true, pci_bits, !!(wants & VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MASK)); - vga_irq_set_state(vgadev, true); + if (!vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga) { + flags |= PCI_VGA_STATE_CHANGE_DECODES; + if (wants & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MEM|VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_MEM)) + pci_bits |= PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY; + if (wants & (VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_IO|VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_IO)) + pci_bits |= PCI_COMMAND_IO; + } + if (!!(wants & VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MASK)) + flags |= PCI_VGA_STATE_CHANGE_BRIDGE; + + pci_set_vga_state(vgadev->pdev, true, pci_bits, flags); + + if (!vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga) { + vga_irq_set_state(vgadev, true); + } vgadev->owns |= (wants & vgadev->decodes); lock_them: vgadev->locks |= (rsrc & VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MASK); @@ -421,6 +440,62 @@ bail: } EXPORT_SYMBOL(vga_put); +/* Rules for using a bridge to control a VGA descendant decoding: + if a bridge has only one VGA descendant then it can be used + to control the VGA routing for that device. + It should always use the bridge closest to the device to control it. + If a bridge has a direct VGA descendant, but also have a sub-bridge + VGA descendant then we cannot use that bridge to control the direct VGA descendant. + So for every device we register, we need to iterate all its parent bridges + so we can invalidate any devices using them properly. +*/ +static void vga_arbiter_check_bridge_sharing(struct vga_device *vgadev) +{ + struct vga_device *same_bridge_vgadev; + struct pci_bus *new_bus, *bus; + struct pci_dev *new_bridge, *bridge; + + vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga = true; + + if (list_empty(&vga_list)) + return; + + /* okay iterate the new devices bridge hierarachy */ + new_bus = vgadev->pdev->bus; + while (new_bus) { + new_bridge = new_bus->self; + + if (new_bridge) { + /* go through list of devices already registered */ + list_for_each_entry(same_bridge_vgadev, &vga_list, list) { + bus = same_bridge_vgadev->pdev->bus; + bridge = bus->self; + + /* see if the share a bridge with this device */ + if (new_bridge == bridge) { + /* if their direct parent bridge is the same + as any bridge of this device then it can't be used + for that device */ + same_bridge_vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga = false; + } + + /* now iterate the previous devices bridge hierarchy */ + /* if the new devices parent bridge is in the other devices + hierarchy then we can't use it to control this device */ + while (bus) { + bridge = bus->self; + if (bridge) { + if (bridge == vgadev->pdev->bus->self) + vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga = false; + } + bus = bus->parent; + } + } + } + new_bus = new_bus->parent; + } +} + /* * Currently, we assume that the "initial" setup of the system is * not sane, that is we come up with conflicting devices and let @@ -500,6 +575,8 @@ static bool vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) vga_default = pci_dev_get(pdev); #endif + vga_arbiter_check_bridge_sharing(vgadev); + /* Add to the list */ list_add(&vgadev->list, &vga_list); vga_count++; @@ -1222,6 +1299,7 @@ static int __init vga_arb_device_init(void) { int rc; struct pci_dev *pdev; + struct vga_device *vgadev; rc = misc_register(&vga_arb_device); if (rc < 0) @@ -1238,6 +1316,13 @@ static int __init vga_arb_device_init(void) vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(pdev); pr_info("vgaarb: loaded\n"); + + list_for_each_entry(vgadev, &vga_list, list) { + if (vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga) + pr_info("vgaarb: bridge control possible %s\n", pci_name(vgadev->pdev)); + else + pr_info("vgaarb: no bridge control possible %s\n", pci_name(vgadev->pdev)); + } return rc; } subsys_initcall(vga_arb_device_init); -- cgit v1.2.3