From be436f6238a17b8432b9de0212bcfc838afb1f85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shinya Kuribayashi Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 19:22:09 +0900 Subject: UBI: misc comment fixes Signed-off-by: Shinya Kuribayashi Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy --- drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c') diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c index cd90ff3b76b..14c10bed94e 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/vtbl.c @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static struct ubi_vtbl_record *process_lvol(struct ubi_device *ubi, * 0 contains more recent information. * * So the plan is to first check LEB 0. Then - * a. if LEB 0 is OK, it must be containing the most resent data; then + * a. if LEB 0 is OK, it must be containing the most recent data; then * we compare it with LEB 1, and if they are different, we copy LEB * 0 to LEB 1; * b. if LEB 0 is corrupted, but LEB 1 has to be OK, and we copy LEB 1 @@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ int ubi_read_volume_table(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_scan_info *si) goto out_free; /* - * Get sure that the scanning information is consistent to the + * Make sure that the scanning information is consistent to the * information stored in the volume table. */ err = check_scanning_info(ubi, si); -- cgit v1.2.3