From 56ff5efad96182f4d3cb3dc6b07396762c658f16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:34:39 -0500 Subject: zero i_uid/i_gid on inode allocation ... and don't bother in callers. Don't bother with zeroing i_blocks, while we are at it - it's already been zeroed. i_mode is not worth the effort; it has no common default value. Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/ramfs/inode.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ramfs') diff --git a/fs/ramfs/inode.c b/fs/ramfs/inode.c index a83a3518ae3..b7e6ac706b8 100644 --- a/fs/ramfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/ramfs/inode.c @@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct inode *ramfs_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, int mode, dev_t dev) inode->i_mode = mode; inode->i_uid = current_fsuid(); inode->i_gid = current_fsgid(); - inode->i_blocks = 0; inode->i_mapping->a_ops = &ramfs_aops; inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info = &ramfs_backing_dev_info; mapping_set_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping, GFP_HIGHUSER); -- cgit v1.2.3