From 4912002fffa377e66c5caefc2c311732a4ad5fb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Kujau Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:25:14 +0000 Subject: Remove EXPERIMENTAL from NFS_FSCACHE There's currently an open Ubuntu bug[0], with the intent to compile NFS_FSCACHE (and possibly AFS_FSCACHE, 9P_FSCACHE) into the standard Ubuntu kernel. However, since *_FSCACHE still depends on EXPERIMENTAL, this won't happen. As Arjan van de Ven pointed out[1], the EXPERIMENTAL flag doesn't mean that much any more, I propose the following patch to fs/nfs/Kconfig. I'd do the same for fs/9p/Kconfig and fs/afs/Kconfig, but as I did not test 9p or AFS, I feel it would not be appropriate for me to remove the flag. [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/440522/comments/5 [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/1/23/145 Signed-off-by: Christian Kujau Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/nfs/Kconfig | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/nfs/Kconfig') diff --git a/fs/nfs/Kconfig b/fs/nfs/Kconfig index 59e5673b4597..a43d07e7b924 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/nfs/Kconfig @@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ config ROOT_NFS Most people say N here. config NFS_FSCACHE - bool "Provide NFS client caching support (EXPERIMENTAL)" - depends on EXPERIMENTAL + bool "Provide NFS client caching support" depends on NFS_FS=m && FSCACHE || NFS_FS=y && FSCACHE=y help Say Y here if you want NFS data to be cached locally on disc through -- cgit v1.2.3