aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>2018-07-10 16:55:57 +0200
committerEduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com>2018-07-12 14:52:39 +0200
commit056de1e894155fbb99e7b43c1c4382d4920cf437 (patch)
tree91b276b5acf52682ff670f55b08f1457c6a83994
parentc447afd5783b9237fa51b7a85777007d8d568bfc (diff)
seccomp: allow sched_setscheduler() with SCHED_IDLE policy
Current and upcoming mesa releases rely on a shader disk cash. It uses a thread job queue with low priority, set with sched_setscheduler(SCHED_IDLE). However, that syscall is rejected by the "resourcecontrol" seccomp qemu filter. Since it should be safe to allow lowering thread priority, let's allow scheduling thread to idle policy. Related to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594456 Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com> Acked-by: Eduardo Otubo <otubo@redhat.com>
-rw-r--r--qemu-seccomp.c12
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
index 148e4c6f24..9cd8eb9499 100644
--- a/qemu-seccomp.c
+++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
@@ -34,6 +34,12 @@
struct QemuSeccompSyscall {
int32_t num;
uint8_t set;
+ uint8_t narg;
+ const struct scmp_arg_cmp *arg_cmp;
+};
+
+const struct scmp_arg_cmp sched_setscheduler_arg[] = {
+ SCMP_A1(SCMP_CMP_NE, SCHED_IDLE)
};
static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall blacklist[] = {
@@ -92,7 +98,8 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall blacklist[] = {
{ SCMP_SYS(setpriority), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
{ SCMP_SYS(sched_setparam), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
{ SCMP_SYS(sched_getparam), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
- { SCMP_SYS(sched_setscheduler), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
+ { SCMP_SYS(sched_setscheduler), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(sched_setscheduler_arg), sched_setscheduler_arg },
{ SCMP_SYS(sched_getscheduler), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
{ SCMP_SYS(sched_setaffinity), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
{ SCMP_SYS(sched_getaffinity), QEMU_SECCOMP_SET_RESOURCECTL },
@@ -118,7 +125,8 @@ static int seccomp_start(uint32_t seccomp_opts)
continue;
}
- rc = seccomp_rule_add(ctx, SCMP_ACT_KILL, blacklist[i].num, 0);
+ rc = seccomp_rule_add_array(ctx, SCMP_ACT_KILL, blacklist[i].num,
+ blacklist[i].narg, blacklist[i].arg_cmp);
if (rc < 0) {
goto seccomp_return;
}