diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/fortran/expr.cc | 1 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/spec_expr_10.f90 | 46 |
2 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/expr.cc index 9a042cd7040..09d1ebd95d2 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/expr.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.cc @@ -3517,6 +3517,7 @@ check_restricted (gfc_expr *e) if (e->error || sym->attr.in_common || sym->attr.use_assoc + || sym->attr.used_in_submodule || sym->attr.dummy || sym->attr.implied_index || sym->attr.flavor == FL_PARAMETER diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/spec_expr_10.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/spec_expr_10.f90 new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..287b5a8d6cc --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/spec_expr_10.f90 @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +! { dg-do compile } +! +! PR fortran/114475 +! The array specification of PP in OL_EVAL used to be rejected in the submodule +! because the compiler was not able to see the host-association of N_EXTERNAL +! there. +! +! Contributed by Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter@desy.de>. + +module t1 + use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding + implicit none + private + public :: t1_t + integer :: N_EXTERNAL = 0 + + type :: t1_t + contains + procedure :: set_n_external => t1_set_n_external + end type t1_t + + abstract interface + subroutine ol_eval (id, pp, emitter) bind(C) + import + real(kind = c_double), intent(in) :: pp(5 * N_EXTERNAL) + end subroutine ol_eval + end interface + interface + module subroutine t1_set_n_external (object, n) + class(t1_t), intent(inout) :: object + integer, intent(in) :: n + end subroutine t1_set_n_external + end interface + +end module t1 + +submodule (t1) t1_s + implicit none +contains + module subroutine t1_set_n_external (object, n) + class(t1_t), intent(inout) :: object + integer, intent(in) :: n + N_EXTERNAL = n + end subroutine t1_set_n_external + +end submodule t1_s |